Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX300

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 front
Portability
94
Imaging
42
Features
38
Overall
40

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX300 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Released March 2006
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
  • Old Model is Olympus E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-450
Sony WX300
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
  • 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
  • Introduced February 2013
  • Later Model is Sony WX350
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX300 Overview

On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-330 and Sony WX300, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and WX300 (18MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and WX300 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-330 was revealed 8 years before the WX300 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony WX300 being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-330 scores versus the WX300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony WX300

 E-330 WX300 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Olympus E-330

 WX300 E-330 
IntroducedFebruary 2013March 2006Newer by 84 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kSharper display (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony WX300

 E-330 WX300 
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 offers outside dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony WX300 has specifications of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-330 and Sony WX300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-330 versus the WX300.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX300 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and WX300 is 65 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through specs. The image underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and WX300.

As you can plainly see, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-330 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony WX300 will resolve more detail because of its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography factors
Sony WX300 Portrait photography factors
54
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
MP count low (7MP)
36
megapixel count decent (18MP)
has face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography details
Sony WX300 Street photography details
60
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than average in class (616g)
lack of image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
63
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (166 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography advice
Sony WX300 Sports photography advice
40
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
49
amazing zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (18MP)
has tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography highlights
Sony WX300 Travel photography highlights
50
lighter than average in class (616g)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
MP count low (7MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
71
lighter than others (166 grams)
megapixel count decent (18MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
no Timelapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography info
Sony WX300 Landscape photography info
45
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inches)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Timelapse recording
44
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (18MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-330
Vlogging with Sony WX300
9
no video recording
35
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (166 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Sony WX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony WX300
 Olympus E-330Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
Also referred to as EVOLT E-330 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2006-03-18 2013-02-20
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3136 x 2352 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 400 3200
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-500mm (20.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-6.5
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.30 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 lb) 166g (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $1,100 $330