Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
73
Overall
61

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Updated by Olympus E-410
Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Launched March 2014
  • Successor is Olympus E-M10 II
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview

Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus E-M10, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both offered by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and E-M10 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (Four Thirds).

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-400 was announced 8 years earlier than the E-M10 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-400 scores versus the E-M10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus E-M10

 E-400 E-M10 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus E-400

 E-M10 E-400 
LaunchedMarch 2014September 2006Fresher by 91 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1037k215kClearer display (+822k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-M10

 E-400 E-M10 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 comes with exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 has measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") along with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus E-M10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-400 and the E-M10.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and E-M10 is 77 and 82 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by viewing a spec sheet. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and E-M10.

Clearly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus E-M10 to result in extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-400 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography information
Olympus E-M10 Portrait photography information
46
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
no manual exposure
megapixel count low (10MP)
71
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detect focus
exports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-400
Street photography with Olympus E-M10
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
77
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
features touch focus
great high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than competitors (396 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography details
Olympus E-M10 Sports photography details
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
slow frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-M10 as a Travel photography camera
49
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
67
features touch focus
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
more heavy than competitors (396g)
display isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-400
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10
45
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
does not have Timelapse mode
79
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-M10 Vlogging highlights
9
no video
33
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing microphone support
more heavy than competitors (396g)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-M10
 Olympus E-400Olympus OM-D E-M10
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-400 Olympus OM-D E-M10
Class Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2006-09-14 2014-03-18
Physical type Compact SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 81
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 45 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 215k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.58x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.80 m (ISO100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64)
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 grams (0.96 lb) 396 grams (0.87 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 72
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.3
DXO Low light score not tested 884
Other
Battery life - 320 images
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10))
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $599 $600