Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Launched March 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus E-M10, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both offered by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and E-M10 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-400 was announced 8 years earlier than the E-M10 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-400 scores versus the E-M10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-400 & Olympus OM-D E-M10. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus E-M10
E-400 | E-M10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus E-400
E-M10 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2014 | ![]() | September 2006 | Fresher by 91 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer display (+822k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-M10
E-400 | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 comes with exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 has measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") along with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-400 versus Olympus E-M10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-400 and the E-M10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e3db/3e3dbfcf7d30c0eace525531f1851307c762bc4d" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and E-M10 is 77 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f356/9f356f09705b0023ad4b6af87969ed4c6b23bbed" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing simply by viewing a spec sheet. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and E-M10.
Clearly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus E-M10 to result in extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older E-400 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a108/1a108dc1a5f188ce78a301b9b18a9d9660398acf" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43b9b/43b9b5dd38ea7e804247840b1fcb2b2ab49c41c9" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2014-03-18 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.58x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m (ISO100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 grams (0.96 lb) | 396 grams (0.87 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 884 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $599 | $600 |