Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/153be/153bee67a3de8b34d60d9df4ae954e556a9475c8" alt="Olympus SZ-30MR front Olympus SZ-30MR front"
89 Imaging
39 Features
39 Overall
39
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Newer Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced March 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are sold by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and SZ-30MR (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and SZ-30MR (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-400 was launched 5 years earlier than the SZ-30MR which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SZ-30MR being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-400 grades vs the SZ-30MR with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Olympus SZ-30MR. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus SZ-30MR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus SZ-30MR
E-400 | SZ-30MR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-30MR over the Olympus E-400
SZ-30MR | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2011 | ![]() | September 2006 | More modern by 54 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus SZ-30MR
E-400 | SZ-30MR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 enjoys outside dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-30MR has proportions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-400 vs the SZ-30MR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d7db/6d7db806fc1032fe74b437907568021be2cf0edc" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and SZ-30MR is 77 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22748/2274885896d1665a03dd742900a7b4536f57616d" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The picture here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and SZ-30MR.
As you can see, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-400 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus SZ-30MR will give greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb0fd/cb0fd277e77c202c98084047eba8f6fe9e6086a8" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/741cf/741cf44fb029c0375266141d768f8530298f1462" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus SZ-30MR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus SZ-30MR |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2011-03-02 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 215k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1700 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lb) | 226 gr (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $599 | $279 |