Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic ZS200
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Updated by Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS100
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-860 and Panasonic ZS200, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the TG-860 (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is relatively similar but the TG-860 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-860 was revealed 4 years before the ZS200 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the TG-860 scores against the ZS200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Panasonic ZS200
| TG-860 | ZS200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus TG-860
| ZS200 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2018 |  | February 2015 | Fresher by 36 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 1240k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+780k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Panasonic ZS200
| TG-860 | ZS200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-860 provides external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-860 and Panasonic ZS200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the TG-860 vs the ZS200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-860 and ZS200 is 91 and 86 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The visual below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-860 and ZS200.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-860 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Panasonic ZS200 will offer you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The older TG-860 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
| Alternate name | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
| Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2018-02-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224 grams (0.49 lb) | 340 grams (0.75 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 370 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $279 | $800 |
