Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and TG-310 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-400 was introduced 5 years before the TG-310 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-400 matches up against the TG-310 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Olympus TG-310. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus TG-310
| E-400 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-400
| TG-310 | E-400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | September 2006 | More modern by 52 months |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-310
| E-400 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-400 against the TG-310.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and TG-310 is 77 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The pic underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and TG-310.
To sum up, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-310 will give extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Olympus E-400 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Released | 2006-09-14 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $599 | $0 |