Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Successor is Olympus E-410
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and TG-310 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The E-400 was introduced 5 years before the TG-310 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-400 matches up against the TG-310 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus TG-310

 E-400 TG-310 
Manual focus Dial precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-400

 TG-310 E-400 
ReleasedJanuary 2011September 2006More modern by 52 months
Screen dimension2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-310

 E-400 TG-310 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-400 has outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-400 against the TG-310.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and TG-310 is 77 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The pic underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-400 and TG-310.

To sum up, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-400 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-310 will give extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-400
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-310
46
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
no manual control
resolution not great (10MP)
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
supports face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-310 Street photography highlights
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than others in class (155g)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography highlights
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery power (150 shots)
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography information
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography information
49
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
67
lighter than others in class (155 grams)
environment proofing
decent MP (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
bad battery power (150 shots)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography information
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography information
45
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inch)
doesn't have liveview
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
39
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
bad battery power (150 shots)
does not have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-310 Vlogging factors
9
no video recording
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
lighter than others in class (155g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus TG-310
 Olympus E-400Olympus TG-310
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-400 Olympus TG-310
Class Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Released 2006-09-14 2011-01-06
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.20 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435g (0.96 lb) 155g (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 150 shots
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch cost $599 $0