Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic G85
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38


69 Imaging
54 Features
84 Overall
66
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic G85 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced September 2006
- Replacement is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 505g - 128 x 89 x 74mm
- Announced September 2016
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-G80
- New Model is Panasonic G95

Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic Lumix G85: A Detailed, Hands-On Comparison for Photographers in 2024
Choosing the right camera is always a balancing act - between your budget, intended use cases, and technical preferences. In this deep-dive comparison, I put two very different Micro Four Thirds (MFT) system cameras side by side: the Olympus E-400, a classic entry-level DSLR from 2006, and the more recent Panasonic Lumix G85, an advanced mirrorless camera released in 2016.
While separated by a decade in design and technology, these two models share a sensor format but cater to very different users. Having spent extensive time behind both cameras, testing their features under real-world conditions, I offer you an authoritative analysis focusing not just on specs, but on practical performance, handling, and value for modern photographers.
Whether you’re a beginner with an eye on budget gear, a landscape shooter, or a professional seeking a versatile travel companion, this comparison will highlight where each camera excels - and falls short.
A Snapshot: Physical Size, Ergonomics, and Build Quality
First impressions matter - especially when you handle the camera every day. The Olympus E-400 is tiny: one of the smallest DSLRs ever built, it clearly targets entry-level users prioritizing portability without the complexity of pro-grade bodies. The Panasonic G85 measures larger and feels notably more substantial in hand, reflecting its advanced features and weather sealing.
Olympus E-400:
- Compact SLR body with polycarbonate shell
- Barebones weather resistance; no sealing
- Weighs 435g, dimensions 130×91×53 mm - featherlight and pocket-friendlier
- Minimal external controls, simple grip
Panasonic G85:
- Mirrorless, SLR-style design but more rugged
- Weather-sealed magnesium alloy chassis (resistant to light rain and dust)
- Heftier at 505g and slightly deeper (128×89×74 mm)
- Ergonomic with a deeper grip and more buttons/dials for direct access
From an ergonomic standpoint, the G85’s sculpted grip and thoughtful button layout make long shooting sessions comfortable - a critical difference for outdoor and professional use. In contrast, the E-400’s slim build favors travel light scenarios but sacrifices some handling finesse.
Top View Control Layout: Mastery vs Simplicity
When evaluating a camera’s practical usability, the top controls are a strong indicator of its intended user base.
The Olympus E-400 sticks to a minimal approach - a mode dial, shutter release, and basic exposure control switches. For beginners transitioning from point-and-shoots, this simplicity is a boon. However, the lack of dedicated exposure compensation or customizable buttons can frustrate photographers wanting quick access to settings in dynamic environments.
The Panasonic G85 ups the ante with dedicated dials for exposure compensation, shutter speed, and aperture - including a combined mode dial with a lock switch to prevent accidental changes. Plus, customizable function buttons and a handy record button for video integrate seamlessly into the top plate - making it ideal for speed and precision.
If you value tactile control for rapid adjustments - especially in fast-paced situations like sports, wildlife, or events - the G85’s layout is a welcome upgrade.
Sensor Specifications and Image Quality
The sensor is the beating heart of any camera, influencing everything from resolution to dynamic range and ISO performance. Though both cameras share the Micro Four Thirds sensor size - measuring 17.3 x 13 mm with an effective crop factor of about 2.1× - their sensor technologies differ substantially.
Olympus E-400
- 10MP CCD sensor - typical for its era
- Max ISO 1600 native, no boosted ISO
- 4:3 aspect ratio, optical low-pass (anti-aliasing) filter present
- Raw support available, but limited dynamic range and lower color depth compared to modern sensors
Panasonic G85
- 16MP CMOS sensor
- Max ISO 25,600 (boosted), excellent noise control up to ISO 3200+
- No AA filter - sharper images but demands precise focusing
- Advanced image processor delivers superb color depth and dynamic range
Hands-on testing revealed a clear edge for the G85 in image quality. Its CMOS sensor, coupled with Panasonic’s latest processing engine, delivers cleaner images with richer tones, especially in low light. Landscape and portrait shooters will appreciate the higher resolution and improved dynamic range, enabling more flexibility in post. The E-400’s CCD sensor still produces pleasing colors but is limited by lower resolution and struggles more with noise and highlight retention.
LCD Screen and Electronic Viewfinder: Informing Your Creative Process
Viewing your subject and reviewing images is critical - and here we move from basic to advanced display technology.
The Olympus E-400 has a modest 2.5-inch fixed LCD with 215,000-dot resolution, no touch capabilities, and is often viewed as a secondary tool given the DSLR’s reliance on its optical viewfinder. No live view or articulation limits creative angles and on-the-fly composition.
Conversely, the Panasonic G85 sports a 3.0-inch fully articulating touchscreen LCD with over 1 million dots - much brighter, more colorful, and versatile. Touch focus selection, swipe navigation, and live view video compose a highly interactive experience.
Its electronic viewfinder (EVF) offers 2.36 million dots, 100% coverage, and 0.74x magnification - vastly superior to the E-400’s pentamirror optical viewfinder with 95% coverage and 0.46x magnification. The EVF’s eye-level preview of exposure, white balance, and focus peaking is invaluable when shooting in challenging light or manual focus situations.
This significant leap enables Panasonic’s mirrorless to deliver a modern shooting experience that greatly benefits both beginners learning composition and pros requiring confidence in exposure and focus.
Autofocus Systems: From Basic to Sophisticated
The autofocus (AF) system is critical, especially for action, wildlife, and event photography that demands speed and accuracy.
-
Olympus E-400:
- 3-point phase detection AF, no face or eye detection
- Selective and continuous AF modes, but no tracking
- No contrast-detection or live view AF
-
Panasonic G85:
- 49-point contrast-detection AF with advanced DFD (Depth From Defocus) technology
- Face detection, eye detection, tracking AF modes for moving subjects
- Touch AF on live view and video
In real-world tests, the Olympus E-400’s AF is serviceable for portraits and still subjects but becomes frustrating for moving targets. The G85’s advanced hybrid AF - though contrast-based rather than phase detection - was consistently faster and more reliable, effectively locking onto faces and moving wildlife. The face and eye AF especially stood out for portrait work, reducing missed shots and improving keep rates.
For street or sports photographers craving confidence in autofocus, the G85 is simply in a different league.
Photography Genres: Which Camera Shines Where?
Both cameras can cover a wide range of photography styles, but their strengths and weaknesses show through when pressed into specific genres.
Portrait Photography
The G85’s higher resolution, better dynamic range, and face/eye detection autofocus contribute to cleaner skin tones, pleasing bokeh (with compatible lenses), and improved focus accuracy for critical portrait shots. The E-400 handles basic portraits well but can be challenged by low-contrast or fast-moving subjects and offers fewer autofocus aids.
Landscape Photography
Landscape shooters demand resolution, dynamic range, and weather resistance for harsh outdoor conditions. The Panasonic G85 offers 16MP resolution and 12.5 EVs dynamic range (per DxOMark), along with dust and splash sealing - a clear advantage over the Olympus E-400’s 10MP CCD, lower dynamic range, and unsealed body. The articulating screen also helps for compositions at odd angles.
Wildlife Photography
For tracking fleeting subjects, autofocus speed and burst rate count. The E-400’s 3 fps and 3-point AF lag behind the G85’s 9 fps and 49-point AF with face/tracking modes, marking the Panasonic camera as the better option for wildlife enthusiasts armed with fast telephotos.
Sports Photography
Sports demand rapid burst modes, predictive AF, and handling ergonomics. The G85’s 9 fps continuous shooting and superior AF tracking put it ahead, while the E-400 is less suited for this genre.
Street Photography
The Olympus E-400’s compact size and discreet shutter sound might appeal to street photographers seeking subtlety. However, the G85’s somewhat larger size but versatility (including silent electronic shutter at 1/16000s) and superior high ISO performance create a compelling argument for the more advanced mirrorless.
Macro Photography
Both benefit from Micro Four Thirds lenses, but Panasonic’s in-body 5-axis stabilization on the G85 aids critical handheld macro shots, along with focus stacking support. The E-400 lacks image stabilization and focus bracketing.
Night/Astro Photography
The Panasonic G85’s higher native ISO ceiling (25600 boost), low noise, and articulating live view make it vastly better suited for starscapes or long exposures. The E-400’s ISO 1600 cap and CCD sensor noise limit ultra-low light use.
Video Capabilities
The E-400 offers no video - a showstopper for hybrid shooters. The G85 shines here with 4K UHD recording at 30p, full HD at 60p, 4:2:0 8-bit color, microphone input, and in-body stabilization for smooth handheld footage.
Travel Photography
For travelers juggling photo needs, the Olympus E-400’s small size and light weight offer an advantage in portability, but the lack of weather sealing and video capabilities are limitations. The G85 balances size and features smartly for multi-discipline trips.
Professional Work
While neither belongs to the flagship category, the G85’s rugged sealing, higher bit-depth raw files, extended ISO, and superior AF/EVF experience lend themselves to more demanding workflows and client deliverables.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
Both cameras use the Micro Four Thirds mount system, but lens line-ups have evolved greatly.
- Olympus E-400: Compatible with the original Four Thirds lenses and early Micro Four Thirds optics - fewer native modern options, limited recent autofocus lens support.
- Panasonic G85: Access to an expansive range of over 100 native Micro Four Thirds lenses, from prime street and portrait lenses to high-performance telephotos and macro glass. Also compatible with Olympus MFT lenses.
A critical consideration here is Panasonic’s ongoing investment in autofocus motors and lens stabilization, fully integrated with the body’s capabilities.
Battery Life and Storage Options
The G85 offers better endurance at approximately 330 shots per charge vs the E-400’s unspecified but historically more limited performance (typical DSLRs of that era averaged ~300 shots per battery). The G85 uses the widespread SD card format, while the E-400 uses now-obsolete CompactFlash and xD cards - a modern inconvenience.
Connectivity Features
The Olympus E-400 has no wireless features, no HDMI output, and only USB 2.0 for tethered transfers.
The Panasonic G85 adds built-in Wi-Fi for remote control and image transfer, along with full HDMI output to support external monitors - essential for videographers and studio use.
Price-to-Performance Assessment
At launch, the Olympus E-400 retailed around $600, and despite its age, may still appeal as a budget DSLR for beginners willing to accept its limitations.
The Panasonic G85, priced near $900 used or new, provides tremendous value given its advanced feature set, making it one of the best all-around mirrorless cameras for enthusiasts and semi-pro shooters in 2024.
The above gallery highlights real images captured with each camera at ISO 400, in mixed light conditions. The Panasonic G85 images demonstrate crisper details, better color reproduction, and superior shadow recovery - reflecting its sensor and processing strengths.
Final Performance Scores and User Recommendations
These comparative scores illustrate the clear gap in performance, autofocus sophistication, video functionality, and versatility of the Panasonic G85 versus the Olympus E-400.
Which Camera Should You Choose?
Here’s my clear-cut advice based on needs and budget:
-
If you want a lightweight, simple entry-level DSLR primarily for casual photography or learning the basics, and appreciate retro form factor or photography as a hobby without video, the Olympus E-400 can serve as an affordable stepping stone - especially if found at a bargain used price.
-
For enthusiasts or professionals needing a versatile, weather-sealed camera capable of tackling portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, macro, and video work, the Panasonic Lumix G85 is an outstanding choice. It offers excellent image quality, robust autofocus, and modern user amenities that justify the higher price.
-
Videographers and hybrid shooters, the G85 is a no-brainer due to its 4K video and in-body stabilization.
-
Travel photographers who want a small but powerful camera will appreciate the G85’s balance of size, durability, and imaging capabilities over the dated E-400.
Closing Thoughts: The Evolution of Micro Four Thirds in a Decade
Testing these cameras side-by-side provides a fascinating lens on how far Micro Four Thirds technology has advanced. The Olympus E-400 remains a charming and historically important entry-level DSLR - a product of its time with notable constraints in today's environment. On the other hand, the Panasonic G85 embodies the rich, feature-packed potential of mirrorless MFT systems today, blending innovation with practical performance that suits a diverse photography and video arsenal.
If you seek longevity, flexibility, and cutting-edge features, the G85 shines bright. But for newcomers or collectors seeking a minimalist camera with a legacy appeal, the E-400 still holds nostalgic allure.
If you have questions about specific use cases or want hands-on advice tailored to your photography style, feel free to ask. My experience with both cameras affirms that the right camera is always the one that inspires you to pick it up and create!
Olympus E-400 vs Panasonic G85 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-G80 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2006-09-14 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4592 x 3448 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.20 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 505g (1.11 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 128 x 89 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 71 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 656 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $900 |