Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A290

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
47
Overall
51

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A290 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed September 2006
  • New Model is Olympus E-410
Sony A290
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Superseded the Sony A230
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A290 Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-400 vs Sony A290, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and A290 (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and A290 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-400 was unveiled 4 years before the A290 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).

Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-400 grades vs the A290 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony A290

 E-400 A290 

Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus E-400

 A290 E-400 
ReleasedJune 2010September 2006Newer by 45 months
Display sizing2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kCrisper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony A290

 E-400 A290 
Focus manually Very precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 provides physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony A290 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

See the Olympus E-400 vs Sony A290 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-400 vs the A290.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A290 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and A290 is 77 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The pic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and A290.

All in all, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-400 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A290 will offer you more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged E-400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography factors
Sony A290 Portrait photography factors
46
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
manual exposure not possible
low MP (10MP)
65
has manual focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography advice
Sony A290 Street photography advice
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Sports photography camera
Sony A290 as a Sports photography camera
38
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
does not have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
terrible battery pack (290 per charge)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-400
Travel photography with Sony A290
49
flash built-in
missing Timelapse mode
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
53
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
terrible battery pack (290 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography highlights
Sony A290 Landscape photography highlights
45
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
small screen (2.5")
does not have liveview
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
missing Timelapse mode
58
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (14MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7")
doesn't have liveview
terrible battery pack (290 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging highlights
Sony A290 Vlogging highlights
9
can't shoot video
9
no video shooting
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Sony A290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony A290
 Olympus E-400Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-400 Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
Class Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2006-09-14 2010-06-09
Body design Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4592 x 3056
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Number of lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 215k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.55x
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Max video resolution None None
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 gr (0.96 lb) 549 gr (1.21 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 66
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 615
Other
Battery life - 290 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $599 $600