Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01ae1/01ae1246b008c2c1438d02f27195e5dcd053dfef" alt="Olympus TG-610 front Olympus TG-610 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released June 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-610, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and TG-610 (14MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and TG-610 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-420 was announced 3 years prior to the TG-610 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-420 grades versus the TG-610 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-420 & Olympus TG-610. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus TG-610
E-420 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Olympus E-420
TG-610 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | June 2008 | Newer by 30 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-610
E-420 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-420 has outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-610 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-610 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-420 versus the TG-610.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c20e/5c20eadaf90b485daaa28521016bc6bd1d008b09" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and TG-610 is 77 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccd4b/ccd4babaa001dd2bd69031561ce902a33889c780" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by going through technical specs. The image here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and TG-610.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus TG-610 will produce extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51a20/51a206936c07d17c729d486a034c7b4c2d74a4e8" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58b05/58b051590e9869316a309f68e566415a558d2223" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Olympus TG-610 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Olympus TG-610 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2008-06-23 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 210 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $999 | $223 |