Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable but the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SP-565UZ was unveiled 4 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SP-565UZ matches up versus the XZ-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-565UZ & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
SP-565UZ | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus SP-565UZ
XZ-2 iHS | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 47 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
SP-565UZ | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-565UZ offers physical dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the SP-565UZ against the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1620f/1620fc0188c6a7a41a7771b227bac2bdd43c73c8" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and XZ-2 iHS is 72 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/344ab/344abaa15a14ad4b49d6fcf78f68cb3bef9c6e98" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The image underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SP-565UZ having a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will provide greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64a0b/64a0bde6588d09c0e064f63b2ac3ed54451fec9e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2289d/2289d22091e94e99c116a8b52563a2304491616a" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-01-15 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413g (0.91 lb) | 346g (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 30 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 68 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $400 | $450 |