Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is pretty close but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-420 was revealed 4 years prior to the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-420 matches up against the TG-820 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-420 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-420 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-420
TG-820 iHS | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | June 2008 | Fresher by 44 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-420 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-420 features outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-420 compared to the TG-820 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5fdc/d5fdc1eb01b30c65ecb056525d0b2f3bea699754" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and TG-820 iHS is 77 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/727f2/727f2af9ac9c03210680c4383cae957f88989979" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-420 and TG-820 iHS.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-420 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will render extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-420 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/598cf/598cf55f3aacb019ea659d3344c19703d1beaab1" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f664/1f664e5cf93320826ca6b4ab11be608fdb633eb4" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-420 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2008-06-23 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 gr (0.94 pounds) | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 220 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $999 | $500 |