Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-110

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40
Olympus E-420 front
 
Olympus VG-110 front
Portability
97
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched June 2008
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-410
Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Launched February 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-110: An Exhaustive Comparative Analysis for Discerning Photographers

In the realm of amateur and enthusiast photography, choosing the right camera is critical for long-term satisfaction and creative versatility. Olympus has been a notable contributor across multiple camera categories, offering models catering to a broad spectrum of photographer needs and budgets. This article presents an authoritative, in-depth comparison of two Olympus models from distinct segments and eras: the Olympus E-420, an entry-level DSLR from 2008, and the Olympus VG-110, an ultracompact point-and-shoot launched in 2011. Both cameras serve divergent user bases and photographic styles, which this analysis will elucidate through rigorous technical evaluation and real-world applicability across all major photographic disciplines.

Throughout this comparison, insights are drawn from comprehensive hands-on experience, benchmark metrics, and established testing methodologies, ensuring practical guidance and a balanced perspective.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison

Body Design and Handling: Ergonomics and Size Considerations

Olympus E-420: Compact DSLR with Legacy Ergonomics

The E-420 reflects Olympus’s attempt to condense DSLR functionalities into a compact frame for entry-level DSLR adopters. Its dimensions of 130 x 91 x 53 mm and weight of 426 grams present as notably lightweight compared to contemporaries but still maintain the heft and grip of a traditional SLR-style body. The camera incorporates a pentamirror optical viewfinder with approx. 95% frame coverage and 0.46x magnification - adequate for framing but modest when benchmarked against professional DSLRs.

Ergonomically, the E-420’s control layout is intentionally sparse, featuring no illuminated buttons and a relatively small, fixed 2.7-inch screen with 230k-dot resolution. The absence of touchscreen or articulating display reduces interface fluidity. However, physical buttons and dials allowed for tactile operation in challenging environments, a trait appreciated by users prioritizing manual controls.

Olympus VG-110: Ultra-Portable Convenience

In stark contrast, the VG-110 measures a diminutive 92 x 54 x 20 mm and weighs just 105 grams, positioning itself as a pocket-friendly travel companion or casual snapper’s tool. Its ultracompact body forgoes any viewfinder and relies solely on the 2.7-inch fixed TFT LCD display. The reduced size translates to comfort in everyday carry and discrete use, ideal for street photographers and travelers who require minimal bulk.

The VG-110 omits physical dials altogether, favoring automatic exposure and simplified operation without manual modes or priority settings. This limits creative control but enhances ease of use for novices.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison

Interface and Controls: User Experience in Practice

When analyzing the control ergonomics from the top view, the E-420 exhibits the traditional DSLR setup with dedicated exposure mode dials (including shutter and aperture priority modes), a manual exposure option, and integrated popup flash controls. The inclusion of a self-timer with 2 or 12-second delay accommodates basic shooting scenarios requiring stability or group shots.

Conversely, the VG-110’s top surface eschews such controls for streamlined minimalism - a shutter release button and toggle for flash modes. The lack of exposure compensation, manual focus, or priority settings constrains user intervention but matches the point-and-shoot ethos emphasizing instant capture.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Comparative Technical Dissection

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison

The core determinant of photographic potential lies in sensor technology - a comprehensive appraisal reveals critical differences:

Olympus E-420 Sensor

  • Sensor type: Four Thirds CMOS
  • Physical size: 17.3 x 13 mm (approx. 224.9 mm²)
  • Resolution: 10 megapixels (3648 x 2736 pixels)
  • Anti-aliasing filter: Present

The Four Thirds sensor in the E-420 is substantially larger than typical compact camera sensors, offering superior light-gathering capabilities, dynamic range, and color depth. According to DxOMark benchmarks, the E-420 scores notably in:

  • Color Depth: 21.5 bits
  • Dynamic Range: 10.4 EV
  • Low-Light ISO: 527 (baseline for acceptable noise levels)

The CMOS design facilitates efficient noise control and faster readout, beneficial for both stills and live view.

Olympus VG-110 Sensor

  • Sensor type: 1/2.3" CCD
  • Physical size: 6.17 x 4.55 mm (approx. 28.07 mm²)
  • Resolution: 12 megapixels (3968 x 2976 pixels)
  • Anti-aliasing filter: Present

The smaller CCD sensor paired with a higher pixel count results in increased pixel density, which often correlates with reduced performance in low-light and dynamic range capabilities. Notably, no DxOMark data is available, but industry standards suggest:

  • Color Depth: Lower than Four Thirds cameras due to sensor size
  • Dynamic Range: Limited relative to DSLR sensors
  • High ISO performance: Inferior due to sensor architecture and size

CCD sensors typically produce desirable color rendition but struggle with noise at sensitivity extremes.

Autofocus Systems: Precision and Speed

Olympus E-420 Focus System

The E-420 employs a hybrid AF system integrating both phase detection and contrast detection methods, assisted by:

  • 3 autofocus points, with multi-area, single, and continuous AF modes
  • Selective AF region selection
  • Live View AF capability

Despite the limited number of focus points (only 3), the inclusion of phase detection enhances speed and accuracy over contrast detection alone. Continuous AF enables moderate tracking performance in suitable scenarios but isn’t optimized for highly dynamic subjects such as sports or wildlife.

Olympus VG-110 Focus System

The VG-110 relies exclusively on contrast detection autofocus with:

  • Face detection enabled (unique for its class at the time)
  • Multi-area and spot autofocus modes
  • No manual focus

The contrast detection system is inherently slower, especially in low light, and the absence of phase detection reduces responsiveness, particularly for moving subjects. Face detection provides usability enhancements in portraiture but cannot replace fast tracking systems.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

LCD Screen and Viewfinder: Visual Feedback and Composition Tools

Both cameras provide a fixed 2.7-inch screen with 230k-dot resolution, which by contemporary standards is modest. The E-420 supplements the rear display with an optical pentamirror viewfinder covering 95% of the frame, crucial for eye-level shooting and daylight visibility.

The VG-110, however, lacks any viewfinder, mandating reliance on the LCD. This reliance complicates shooting in bright conditions but aligns with its casual design and convenience orientation.

Lens Systems and Compatibility

Olympus E-420: Micro Four Thirds Ecosystem

This DSLR (often categorized by some sources as Four Thirds, but uses a Micro Four Thirds lens mount) supports a broad selection of 45 compatible lenses ranging from ultra-wide primes to super-telephoto zooms, including Olympus’s Zuiko optics and third-party manufacturers. The effective focal length multiplier of 2.1x (traditional Four Thirds standard) provides substantial telephoto reach, important for wildlife and sports.

Absent built-in image stabilization in the camera body necessitates lens-based stabilization for handheld benefit. The lens mount flexibility significantly enhances creative opportunities across genres.

Olympus VG-110: Fixed Zoom Lens

The VG-110 comes with a built-in 27-108mm equivalent zoom lens (4× optical zoom) with a maximum aperture range of f/2.9 to f/6.5. While compact and versatile for general shooting, its limited aperture and fixed lens constrain depth of field control and low-light capability. The 1cm macro focus distance affords close-up potential for casual macro photography.

Performance in Specific Photography Genres

Portrait Photography

  • E-420: The camera’s larger sensor capable of richer skin tone gradation and background blur (bokeh) due to longer focal lengths and aperture control. The moderate AF points and absence of face/eye detection autofocus reduces tracking reliability but manual focus allows fine refinement.
  • VG-110: Incorporates face detection AF, useful for casual portraits, but small sensor and limited aperture preclude significant background separation and nuanced tone rendering.

Landscape Photography

  • E-420: Superior dynamic range and resolution assist in capturing wide tonal variations and fine detail in nature scenes. Weather sealing is absent, limiting harsh environment use. Robust lens selection allows ultra-wide and tilt-shift lenses appropriate for landscapes.
  • VG-110: Sensor size and dynamic range limit HDR potential and image clarity in complex lighting. The camera’s light weight aids portability but no environmental sealing.

Wildlife Photography

  • E-420: Effective due to substantial telephoto reach (given suitable lenses), continuous AF mode, and 4 fps burst shooting. Moderate autofocus points affect tracking fast-moving animals in dense environments.
  • VG-110: Fixed lens zoom and slower AF impede wildlife capture; limited burst capabilities further diminish suitability.

Sports Photography

  • E-420: 4 fps burst offers basic sports action capture, while AF tracking speed and accuracy lag behind professional models. Low native ISO maximum of 1600 restricts performance in poorly lit arenas.
  • VG-110: Not advisable due to slow shutter speed range (max 1/2000 s), limited AF modes, and no burst mode.

Street Photography

  • E-420: Moderate size and noise can be intrusive; optical viewfinder benefits conventional framing under bright light.
  • VG-110: Ideal for street photography enthusiasts valuing discretion, light weight, and quiet operation; LCD-only composition adequate in varied conditions.

Macro Photography

  • E-420: Dependent on attached macro lenses; manual focus option enables precision focusing on shallow depth of field.
  • VG-110: Built-in macro function with minimum focusing distance of 1cm provides entry-level close-up capabilities.

Night and Astrophotography

  • E-420: Superior high ISO handling and longer shutter speeds down to 60 seconds facilitate low-light and astrophotography with external tripod support.
  • VG-110: Limited by maximum shutter speed of 4 seconds and sensor noise characteristics; less suited for long exposures.

Video Capabilities

  • E-420: No video recording function - a significant limitation for users requiring multimedia capabilities.
  • VG-110: Offers VGA (640x480) video at 30fps in MPEG-4 format; rudimentary by modern standards and inadequate for serious video work.

Travel Photography

  • E-420: Lightweight for a DSLR, sufficient battery life (~500 shots), and versatile lens options. Bulkier than compacts but balanced versatility for travel enthusiasts requiring superior image quality.
  • VG-110: Extremely compact and light, ideal for tourism and everyday casual shooting, though compromised image quality and control.

Professional Applications

  • E-420: Entry-level DSLR with RAW support, moderate resolution, and manual controls enable primary professional deployment in controlled environments or educational contexts. The camera lacks rugged environmental sealing and advanced connectivity options.
  • VG-110: No professional use case; designed strictly for casual users.

Sample images demonstrate the substantial difference in tonal ranges, detail, and depth between the E-420 (left) and VG-110 (right). Note the richer shadows and lesser noise in the DSLR sample.

Build Quality and Reliability

Neither camera offers weather sealing or enhanced durability features. The E-420’s more substantial body affords increased resilience; its battery is a proprietary pack delivering approximately 500 shots per charge, aligning with DSLR norms. The VG-110 relies on a smaller LI-70B battery, rated for around 170 shots, a notable limitation requiring frequent charging during extended outings.

Connectivity and Storage

The E-420 stores images on either CompactFlash (Type I/II) or xD Picture Card media, consistent with its era but constraints in media speed and capacity contrast with newer SDXC standards. The VG-110 employs the more modern SD/SDHC cards, offering better availability and capacity flexibility.

Neither camera supports wireless connectivity, GPS geotagging, HDMI output, or external audio. USB 2.0 ports allow basic tethering and data transfer but are slow by current benchmarks.

Comparative Summary: Overall Performance Ratings

Aspect Olympus E-420 Olympus VG-110
Body type Entry-level DSLR Ultracompact Point & Shoot
Sensor size (mm²) 224.9 28.07
Resolution (MP) 10 12
ISO Range 100 – 1600 80 – 1600
Autofocus Points 3 (phase + contrast detection) Contrast detection with face AF
Burst Rate (fps) 4 N/A
Video Capability None VGA @30fps
Viewfinder Optical pentamirror None
LCD Size & Resolution 2.7" / 230k dots 2.7" / 230k dots
Battery Life (shots) ~500 ~170
Weight 426g 105g
Price (at release) Approx. $999 Approx. $150

Performance across disciplines clearly favors the E-420 for almost all serious photography use-cases except portability and street use.

Recommendations Based on Photography Disciplines and Budget

Who Should Choose the Olympus E-420?

  • Photographers seeking manual exposure control and RAW image capture
  • Entry-level DSLR users wanting a step into lens interchangeability
  • Those engaging in landscape, portrait, wildlife, or macro photography that require larger sensors and better image quality
  • Users interested in moderate burst shooting and continuous autofocus
  • Budget-conscious buyers able to source affordable second-hand units and existing compatible lenses

Who Should Opt for the Olympus VG-110?

  • Casual photographers needing a compact, lightweight carry-everywhere camera
  • Travelers valuing minimal footprint, ease of operation, and simple point-and-shoot functionality
  • Street photographers prioritizing discretion over image quality or advanced controls
  • Users not intending to perform intensive post-processing or raw shooting
  • Those seeking an inexpensive secondary camera or beginner model

Final Thoughts: Evaluating Brand Legacy and Technological Context

The Olympus E-420, despite its 2008 release, endures as a competent mini DSLR for novices investing in traditional photographic workflows centered on sensor quality, manual controls, and lens versatility. Its relatively compact design does not fully mitigate ergonomics typical of DSLRs, but its comprehensive feature set supports diverse photographic objectives.

Conversely, the Olympus VG-110 caters to an entry-level compact market segment emphasizing portability over photographic options. Its fixed lens, limited controls, and weak high ISO performance restrict its utility in demanding situations, although it remains suitable for casual snapshots and travel documentation where convenience trumps quality.

Balancing factors such as sensor size, autofocus sophistication, body ergonomics, and operational flexibility unequivocally positions the E-420 as the superior choice for enthusiasts and semi-professionals. Meanwhile, the VG-110 serves as a budget-friendly alternative for users whose primary criteria are size and user-friendliness.

Selecting between these models should hinge on intended photographic genres, required features, and lifestyle preferences, with clear recognition of the significant compromises inherent to ultracompacts compared to DSLR platforms.

This thorough comparison is designed to assist serious buyers in making expedient, well-informed choices reflective of practical application rather than marketing generalities. Users are encouraged to consider future expansion (e.g., lens purchases), weight tolerance, and creative control needs alongside budget restrictions when deciding between these Olympus cameras.

Olympus E-420 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Olympus VG-110
 Olympus E-420Olympus VG-110
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-420 Olympus VG-110
Type Entry-Level DSLR Ultracompact
Launched 2008-06-23 2011-02-08
Physical type Compact SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 27-108mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.9-6.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video format - MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 426 grams (0.94 pounds) 105 grams (0.23 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 527 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures 170 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-70B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $999 $150