Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de6ae/de6ae63fb6c0ba8b5faf7516704c3c5c53608870" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Updated by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
- Announced July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-3 versus Sony HX9V, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and HX9V (16MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and HX9V (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-3 was brought out 4 years before the HX9V and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony HX9V being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-3 scores vs the HX9V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Sony HX9V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony HX9V
E-3 | HX9V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony HX9V over the Olympus E-3
HX9V | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | ![]() | February 2008 | More recent by 41 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony HX9V
E-3 | HX9V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-3 has got physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Sony HX9V has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-3 versus Sony HX9V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-3 versus the HX9V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74bf6/74bf69099d88d6fd93112b84edb506fe9a5b7760" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and HX9V is 56 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d223/4d2237f46d2f743f5c6b6fe879d1225a2faf5def" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-3 and HX9V.
Clearly, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-3 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony HX9V will give extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c59c5/c59c5839d91b3a69e2fc5009496893157718953e" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db3cf/db3cf456a0ea67fff61af210598d0272efb226de" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Sony HX9V Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $670 | $328 |