Olympus E-420 vs Panasonic Lumix S1R: An In-Depth Camera Showdown Across Eras and Genres

Photography technology has seen a seismic shift over the past decade, transforming the tools of the trade in ways once hard to imagine. This comparative exploration pits the decade-and-a-half-old Olympus E-420, an entry-level DSLR with its charming compactness, against the modern professional powerhouse, the Panasonic Lumix S1R mirrorless full-frame beast.

While their birthdates and market positions couldn’t be more different - the E-420 debuted in 2008 catering to beginners under Olympus’s Four Thirds standard, and the S1R arrived in 2019 designed for demanding professionals - their direct feature-to-feature contrast offers timeless lessons about how camera design and performance evolve.

Having personally evaluated thousands of cameras with an analytical eye and a seasoned photographer’s reflexes, I’ll guide you through every nuance: sensor tech, handling, image quality, autofocus, video chops, and much more. Whether you’re a beginner considering an affordable DSLR or a pro eyeing a full-frame workhorse, this article is your roadmap - grounded firmly in hands-on experience and technical rigor.

First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics & Body Build

The E-420 was famously touted as one of the smallest DSLRs of its time, a true featherweight at 426 grams, all packed into a compact SLR-style body. Panasonic’s S1R, on the other hand, weighs in at 1020 grams - a hulking figure reflecting its professional-grade specs and full-frame mirrorless architecture.

In-hand, the E-420 feels like a nimble point-and-shoot with SLR capabilities. It’s petite, narrow, and quite flat, measuring just 130 x 91 x 53 mm. This small form factor benefits travel and street shooters who prize discretion and lightweight gear. However, the trade-off is reduced grip space and minimal control real estate.

Conversely, the S1R’s 149 x 110 x 97 mm body screams robustness and command. Panasonic carved out an extensive grip with rubberized textures and pronounced contours. This is a camera designed for prolonged handheld use, accommodating large lenses, and offering superior balance. Weather sealing is present here - an essential feature for outdoor and landscape pros aiming for reliability in less-than-ideal conditions.

Handling differences also extend to button layout and customization, which I’ll explore next.

Command Centers: Control Layout and User Interfaces

Both cameras use different design philosophies and interface tech reflecting their eras and user targets.

The Olympus E-420 keeps things simple with a fixed 2.7-inch LCD that provides a modest 230k-dot resolution. Controls are sparse but logically placed, ideal for beginners. However, no touchscreen or articulating screen means less flexibility for creative angles or intuitive menu navigation. The pentamirror optical viewfinder covers around 95% of the frame, adequate but not expansive.

By contrast, the Panasonic S1R boasts a 3.2-inch fully articulating touchscreen LCD with an impressive 2100k-dot resolution. This enables sharp preview images even under direct sunlight. Its electronic viewfinder (EVF) is equally staggering - a 5760k-dot OLED with 100% coverage and 0.78x magnification, offering a bright, immersive framing experience.

Panasonic introduces illuminated buttons for low-light shooting, dual SD card slots for extended recording and backup, and multiple custom function buttons that beg to be assigned for quick access. The interface is typical of a high-end mirrorless with deep customization, live histogram overlays, and customizable button layouts.

This difference means that beginners might appreciate the no-nonsense Olympus layout, while advanced users will revel in Panasonic’s tailored controls.

Sensor Technologies and Image Quality: From Four Thirds to Full Frame

Sensor evolution is the heart of substantial image quality gain. The Olympus E-420 employs a Four Thirds-sized 17.3x13 mm CMOS sensor with a resolution of just 10 megapixels. The Panasonic S1R uses a full-frame 36x24 mm CMOS sensor with an enormous 47.3-megapixel resolution.

From a technical perspective, the S1R’s sensor area is almost four times larger than the E-420’s, providing a fundamental advantage in light gathering capability and dynamic range. The Panasonic sensor dispenses with the anti-aliasing filter, enabling razor-sharp details but demanding critical focus accuracy.

My hands-on tests show the Olympus delivering good color fidelity - typical of Olympus’s TruePic III processor - and respectable dynamic range (~10.4 EV according to DXOMark). The maximum ISO 1600 native is limiting by today’s standards, with noise becoming noticeable in shadows above ISO 800.

The Lumix S1R pushes boundaries, scoring near-perfect DXOmark results with a 14.1 EV dynamic range and high color depth (26.4 bits). The native ISO range extends to 25600, expandable to 51200, maintaining usable image quality in low light thanks to its larger pixels and advanced noise reduction algorithms.

For portraiture, the S1R’s ability to capture fine skin texture and subtle tonal gradations is unmatched. For landscapes, its high-resolution sensor delivers stunning large prints with exceptional shadow-to-highlight rendering. In contrast, the E-420 can hold its ground for casual shooting but lacks the fidelity and low-light headroom to satisfy professional demands.

Autofocus Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking

Autofocus systems are the muscle behind decisive shots, especially for fast or unpredictable subjects.

The Olympus E-420 uses a hybrid autofocus system dubbed “contrast and phase detection,” with only 3 AF points. While it supports basic AF modes - including single, continuous, and selective area - the system struggles with tracking moving subjects or working in low contrast.

The Panasonic S1R sports a 225-area contrast-detection autofocus complemented by advanced AI algorithms for face detection and subject tracking. It also supports continuous AF, eye AF for portraits, and focus stacking/bracketing for macro and landscape precision.

In the field, I tested both in a controlled burst scenario: the E-420’s AF hunted noticeably and collapsed on fast-moving subjects like runners or squirrels. The S1R locked focus swiftly and tracked subjects effectively at 9 frames per second continuous shooting, even in dim conditions down to EV -6.

This makes the S1R vastly superior for wildlife, sports, and dynamic street photography, while the E-420 is still useful for static scenes and learning fundamentals.

Shooting Experience Across Photography Genres

Let’s break down practical camera performance across popular photographic disciplines, highlighting each body’s strengths and limitations.

Portrait Photography

The Panasonic S1R’s high resolution and large sensor excel in rendering natural skin tones and creating shallow depth-of-field bokeh with its Leica L-glass lenses. Eye detection autofocus enhances sharpness on the subject’s eyes, a must-have for compelling portraits.

The Olympus E-420, meanwhile, while capable of pleasing 10MP portraits, struggles to isolate subjects due to a smaller sensor and limited AF. Its fixed LCD hampers live preview of depth-of-field effects.

Landscape Photography

The S1R’s impeccable dynamic range and weather-sealed body enable shooting in varied natural environments - from bright skies to shadowed forests. Its focus stacking feature helps achieve edge-to-edge sharpness.

The E-420’s sensor maxes out at ISO 1600, with more noise limitation and fewer megapixels - meaning large prints may lose detail. Lack of environmental sealing reduces its resilience outdoors.

Wildlife and Sports

Sports and wildlife photographers demand fast burst rates and accurate focus tracking to capture fleeting moments.

The S1R’s 9 fps continuous shooting, broad AF coverage, and 5-axis sensor stabilization allow for sharp, well-framed images of moving subjects, even with long telephotos.

The E-420’s 4 fps burst and narrow 3-point AF system severely limit its suitability in these fast-paced scenarios.

Street Photography

Here, the Olympus E-420’s petite size and light weight shine, enabling discrete shooting. Its noise and resolution limitations can be accommodated in typical street lighting.

The S1R’s larger footprint and louder shutter sound may attract attention and fatigue, although its high ISO capabilities afford shooting in darker urban settings.

Macro Photography

The S1R’s focus bracketing and stacking combined with stabilized close-up shots enable crisp, detailed macro captures.

The E-420 lacks stabilization and advanced AF features, restricting its macro precision.

Night and Astrophotography

The S1R’s low noise at high ISOs and ability to handle long exposures with minimal sensor noise make it appropriate for astrophotography.

The Olympus E-420’s lower maximum ISO and absence of built-in stabilization constrain night shooting quality.

Video Capabilities

Video was not on Olympus E-420’s agenda - it lacks any recording capability.

In stark contrast, the Panasonic S1R supports 4K UHD video at 60p, with rich codec support, microphone and headphone jacks, and in-body image stabilization to smooth footage.

Travel Photography

While the Olympus E-420’s compactness helps travel light, the need for multiple lenses and slow performance dampen the overall utility.

The Panasonic S1R, though heavier, provides versatility across genres, solid battery life, and dual card slots - important for serious travelers seeking recall-proof storage.

Professional Workflow Integration

Panasonic’s S1R offers high-quality raw output compatible with demanding post-processing workflows. It supports USB-C charging and tethered shooting for studio integration.

The E-420 fits best as a beginner’s camera or a lightweight secondary option, with simpler raw files.

Durability, Battery Life, and Storage

The Panasonic’s weather sealing resists dust and moisture, a godsend in often unpredictable environments. Olympus lacks any sealing layers.

Battery life favors Olympus at approximately 500 shots per CIPA rating, marginally longer than the S1R’s 360 shots per charge. However, S1R supports USB charging, enabling in-field power through portable batteries.

Dual SD card slot presence on Panasonic permits overflow or backup recording - vital for professionals. Olympus restricts storage to a single slot supporting Compact Flash or xD cards, which may be harder to find today.

Connectivity and Extras

Here the S1R shows its modern DNA with built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth for remote control and rapid image transfer. USB-C connectivity with power delivery supports charger versatility.

The Olympus E-420 offers only USB 2.0 and no wireless connectivity, requiring card readers or cables for image transfer.

Price and Value Considerations

When new, the Olympus E-420 retailed near $1,000, a competitive price for entry-level DSLR users. Its value today lies in a budget-conscious starter or collectors intrigued by classic Four Thirds systems.

The Panasonic S1R’s professional-grade package commands about $3,700, a steep investment justified by image quality, extensive feature set, and durability.

Putting It All Together: Scores and Recommendations

Synthesizing testing data and photographic use case ratings:

Sample gallery image comparisons below demonstrate the tangible difference in resolution, color, and dynamic range:

Olympus E 420 screen back Panasonic S1R front Panasonic S1R screen back

Final Verdict: Who Should Choose Which?

The Olympus E-420 is a diminutive older DSLR ideal for beginners seeking lightweight handling, ease of use, and affordability in traditional photography. It remains a good stepping stone for those learning DSLR basics but is not recommended for demanding modern photography needs, especially in low-light or high-speed genres.

The Panasonic Lumix S1R stands as a versatile, high-resolution full-frame mirrorless camera built for professionals and serious enthusiasts who require cutting-edge sensor technology, robust autofocus, weather sealing, and extensive video features. Its higher price point is offset by future-proofing and superior image quality across all disciplines.

If your work or hobby includes portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, night photography, or video production - and budget permits - the S1R is unquestionably a worthy investment.

If you want a simple, compact DSLR primarily for daylight or casual shooting and prefer ease of use over cutting-edge specs, Olympus E-420 offers a charming, capable option at entry-level pricing.

How I Tested These Cameras

My evaluation included studio-controlled tests for resolution and dynamic range, as well as real-world shooting across various environments and lighting conditions. Hands-on AF tracking tests used moving subjects under varying contrast and brightness. Image quality analysis involved RAW file processing in Adobe Lightroom and DXO PureRAW to assess noise patterns and color rendition. Ergonomics were evaluated through extended handheld sessions.

The combination of lab benchmarks and field testing supports nuanced conclusions beyond spec sheets.

Summary

• Olympus E-420: Compact, easy to use, entry-level DSLR with limited performance in modern contexts.
• Panasonic S1R: Full-frame mirrorless powerhouse, excelling in resolution, AF, video, and rugged handling - engineered for pros.

Choosing between these two boils down to your photographic ambitions, budget, and how much you value portability versus performance.

Thank you for joining me on this detailed journey through camera evolution. If you have any questions or want hands-on advice about other models, feel free to reach out. Here’s to many great photographs ahead!

HappyShooting

End of article