Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-M1
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40


71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released March 2009
- Superseded the Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Revealed October 2013
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 II

Olympus E-450 vs Olympus OM-D E-M1: A Hands-On Expert Comparison for 2024
Choosing the right camera means matching technical prowess with practical shooting demands. With Olympus’s legacy in mirrorless and DSLR systems, these two models - the Olympus E-450 (2009) and the Olympus OM-D E-M1 (2013) - represent distinct eras and philosophies in camera design and performance. I’ve spent extensive hours behind both, putting them through a gamut of real-world photography tests, side by side with detailed lab measurements and fieldwork. This comparison aims to bring out the real differences and help you decide which camera better fits your shooting style and needs today, whether you’re a keen enthusiast or a professional looking for a reliable tool.
Let’s dive in - from sensor technology and autofocus systems to handling and image quality, all across key photographic disciplines.
Form Factor and Ergonomics: Compact DSLR vs Pro Mirrorless
First impressions count. The Olympus E-450 categorizes itself as an entry-level DSLR with a compact SLR body, while the Olympus OM-D E-M1 is a pro mirrorless designed for demanding shooters. The differences unfold in build quality, control layout, and handling comfort.
-
Size & Weight: The E-450 weighs in at a lightweight 426 grams with dimensions 130x91x53 mm, designed for portability and easy one-handed use. The OM-D E-M1 is heavier and chunkier at 497 grams and 130x94x63 mm, reflecting its solid build and weather sealing.
-
Handling: I found the OM-D E-M1’s deeper grip and robust shutter button layout fit my hand better for long shoots, especially with larger lenses. The E-450 offers a more compact, beginner-friendly grip which may feel less reassuring with telephoto lenses.
Let’s look closer at control schemes:
- The E-M1 provides an advanced top-plate with customizable dials, a dedicated AF joystick, and intuitive mode selectors suited to fast-paced shooting conditions. The E-450’s top controls are minimalist - fewer dials, simpler but less flexible. It’s clear Olympus targeted different users; the E-M1 is built for photographers who require quick manual adjustments, the E-450 for casual shooting and learning.
Sensor and Image Quality: Evolution in Resolution and Dynamic Range
Both cameras share the Four Thirds sensor size - 17.3 x 13 mm - but the evolution is evident in pixel count and image processing.
-
Resolution: The E-450 has a modest 10-megapixel sensor, delivering images at 3648 x 2736 pixels. It was adequate for its time but shows limits today. The E-M1 features a 16-megapixel sensor (4608 x 3456 pixels), which provides notably more detail - useful for cropping or large prints.
-
Image Processing: Olympus’s TruePic III processor in the E-450 contrasts with the significantly more advanced TruePic VII in the E-M1. The newer processor boosts noise reduction and dynamic range handling. Practical daylight and low-light testing (ISO 800-1600) reveal the E-M1 produces cleaner shadows and more nuanced colors.
-
ISO Performance: Native ISO tops out at 1600 on the E-450, while the E-M1 stretches to 25600. While I don’t recommend shooting with the highest ISOs regularly, in real shooting scenarios the E-M1’s higher ISO flexibility enables usable images in dim circumstances (indoor events, nightscapes) where the E-450 struggles.
DxOMark scores reinforce this:
- E-450: Overall 56, Color Depth 21.5 bits, Dynamic Range 10.5 EV
- E-M1: Overall 73, Color Depth 23 bits, Dynamic Range 12.7 EV
The dynamic range difference translates into noticeably better highlight and shadow retention on the E-M1.
Rear Screen and Viewfinder: Optical vs Electronic Experience
Live preview and feedback are essential, especially for composition and focus confirmation.
-
The E-450 has a fixed 2.7-inch LCD with 230k-dot resolution - quite dim and low-res by today’s standards. Its simplistic menu and no touchscreen make navigating settings slower but manageable for beginners.
-
The E-M1 upgrades to a tilting 3-inch touchscreen with 1037k-dot resolution, giving a bright, sharp preview and quick touchscreen focus-point selection. This flexibility greatly enhances low-angle or overhead shoots.
-
Viewfinder: The E-450 sports a basic optical pentamirror viewfinder with 95% coverage and 0.46x magnification. It offers a traditional DSLR experience but can feel limited in accuracy and brightness.
-
The E-M1’s electronic viewfinder (EVF) has a high-resolution 2,360k-dot OLED panel covering 100% of the frame with 0.74x magnification. The real-time exposure preview, focus peaking, and overlay info are invaluable for precise framing and focus assurance.
This combination of touchscreen and EVF gives the E-M1 a clear edge for all types of shooting.
Autofocus Systems: Tracking and Precision for Fast Action
Autofocus capabilities can make or break your shooting experience, especially with moving subjects or in challenging focus scenarios.
-
The E-450 uses a hybrid system with both contrast and phase detection, but only three focus points, hampering compositional flexibility and tracking. It offers single and continuous AF but lacks face detection or tracking.
-
The OM-D E-M1’s AF system is substantially more advanced: 81 focus points covering the frame, with both phase and contrast detection, and face detection in live view mode. It supports AF tracking and continuous focus, dramatically improving tracking of wildlife or sports subjects.
In practical tests - shooting children playing soccer or birds in flight - the E-M1 nailed focus far more reliably. The E-450’s AF often lagged or hunted, resulting in missed shots. This is fundamental if your photography involves fast-moving subjects.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Durability
How well a camera holds up under tough conditions is crucial for professionals or serious enthusiasts.
-
The E-450 has a polycarbonate body without weather sealing. It’s fine for casual indoor or fair-weather use but requires extra caution outdoors.
-
The E-M1 boasts a magnesium alloy body with sealing against dust and splashes, perfect for shooting in rain, dust storms, or adverse environments. I’ve confidently used the E-M1 in misty mornings and dusty trails without worry.
This ruggedness justifies some of the price premium - especially if your work or hobbies demand durability.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
Both cameras use the Micro Four Thirds (MFT) lens mount, but the difference in launch date impacts lens availability and compatibility.
-
The E-450 came early in MFT evolution with a smaller selection of around 45 lenses, including many primes and zooms designed for entry-level photographers.
-
By the time of the E-M1, Olympus & Panasonic jointly expanded the MFT mount to over 107 lenses - from affordable primes to high-end pro zooms and specialty optics (macro, fisheye, telephoto).
The E-M1 supports the newest high-performance lenses featuring faster autofocus motors and in-lens stabilization systems that boost image quality. This flexibility opens doors to all types of photography.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Capabilities
For capturing action, frame rate and shutter speed ranges matter.
-
The E-450 maxes out at 4 fps continuous shooting and has a shutter speed range from 1/60s to 1/4000s.
-
The E-M1 doubles this with 10 fps, shutter speeds up to 1/8000s, and includes advanced exposure bracketing options.
The faster shutter speeds and burst rates of the E-M1 enable freezing rapid motion and capturing decisive moments - important for sports and wildlife photography.
Video Recording and Multimedia Features
Video is now integral to many photographers’ workflows.
-
The E-450 lacks video recording entirely, reflecting its era and design focus on stills.
-
The E-M1 records 1080p Full HD video at 30 fps with H.264 codec, external microphone input, and in-camera image stabilization that helps stabilize footage. While not top-tier video specs by 2024 standards, it suffices for casual video shoots, interviews, and supplementary content.
Its tilting touchscreen aids framing video shots; the E-450’s fixed screen and lack of video capabilities make it unsuitable for multimedia content creators.
Battery Life and Storage Media
Enough juice and storage flexibility keep you shooting longer.
-
The E-450 offers an impressive 500 shots per charge and uses Compact Flash or XD-Picture Cards - both largely obsolete formats today, which might require sourcing legacy media.
-
The E-M1 achieves about 350 shots per battery, less than the older E-450, understandable given advanced features and an EVF. It uses more modern SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with faster write speeds and broader availability.
In practice, I still find 350 shots per battery more than sufficient for most sessions, with USB charging options mitigating downtime.
Connectivity and Extras
Wireless options are important for workflow efficiency.
-
The E-450 has no wireless or Bluetooth connectivity and no HDMI port.
-
The E-M1 includes built-in Wi-Fi for image transfer and remote shooting. It also has an HDMI port for direct video output to external displays.
This makes the E-M1 more workflow-friendly for professionals and social media-savvy photographers.
Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres
It is critical to see how these cameras perform in specific photography disciplines, beyond specs.
-
Portraits: The E-M1’s higher resolution and face-detection AF create sharper, better-focused portraits, richer skin tones, and more compelling bokeh with fast lenses. The E-450’s 10MP limit and spotty AF make it harder to nail precise focus on eyes.
-
Landscapes: The extra resolution and wider dynamic range of the E-M1 yield more detailed landscapes with better highlight preservation. The E-450 can still produce beautiful images but with noisier shadows and less depth.
-
Wildlife: The E-M1’s 10 fps burst and advanced AF tracking outperform the E-450 dramatically, crucial to capturing fast animal movement.
-
Sports: Again, the E-M1 dominates with faster shutter speeds, superior autofocus, and burst shooting rates - ideal for fast-paced action.
-
Street: The E-450’s compact size is mildly advantageous for discreet shooting, but the E-M1’s quieter operation and faster AF ultimately produce better results. Some might prefer the simpler controls of the E-450 for quick grab shots.
-
Macro: With greater lens support and stabilization, the E-M1 better supports precise, close-up work than the entry-level E-450.
-
Night/Astro: The E-M1’s higher max ISO and longer exposure options, along with stable handling, support low-light and astro shooting far better.
-
Video: Video on the E-M1 is functional but basic; E-450 offers none.
-
Travel: Both cameras offer good portability but the E-450’s lighter weight is an edge. However, the E-M1’s versatility, ruggedness, and connectivity often justify carrying the extra bulk.
-
Professional Work: The E-M1’s advanced features, better image quality, reliability, and wide lens range make it suitable for professional use. The E-450 is more a learning or casual camera.
Summary Performance Scores and Recommendations
Our aggregated technical tests and shooting experience assign the Olympus E-M1 a substantially higher performance rating across most categories compared to the E-450.
Final Verdict: Which Olympus Fits Your Shooting Style?
Choose the Olympus E-450 if:
- You are new to DSLR photography and want an affordable, lightweight, entry-level system.
- Your shooting is casual - family, travel snapshots in good lighting.
- You prefer simplicity over feature depth and don’t mind slower AF or lower resolution.
- Budget constraints are tight (the E-450 can be found very cheap today, under $150).
Opt for the Olympus OM-D E-M1 if:
- You demand professional-grade image quality for portraits, landscapes, wildlife, or sports.
- Fast and reliable autofocus with tracking and a plethora of lenses is critical.
- You shoot in challenging environments needing weather sealing and rugged build.
- Video recording and modern connectivity are important.
- You want a camera that remains future-proof with advanced features and high-resolution EVF.
- You can invest a mid-range budget (around $800) for a versatile, performance-packed camera.
Closing Notes From a Veteran Tester
Having tested thousands of cameras over my career, I see the Olympus E-450 and OM-D E-M1 as two snapshots of Olympus’s mirrorless and DSLR evolution more than comparable siblings. The E-450 really is an entry gateway into DSLR shooting with all the associated compromises in speed, image fidelity, and versatility. Meanwhile, the OM-D E-M1 stands firm as a professional-grade hybrid system that delivers what today’s demanding photographers seek - speed, precision, robustness, and image excellence.
If I had to rely on one of them for any serious photographic assignment today, it’d be the OM-D E-M1 hands down. However, for newcomers on a tight budget, the E-450 remains a viable starting point with basic performance and classic DSLR handling.
Whichever camera you prefer, the key is how well it adapts to your photographic vision and workflow. I encourage readers to test these cameras in-store if possible and consider your long-term investment in lenses and accessories.
Happy shooting!
Images used (in order):
size-comparison.jpg | top-view-compare.jpg | sensor-size-compare.jpg | back-screen.jpg | cameras-galley.jpg | camera-scores.jpg | photography-type-cameras-scores.jpg
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-M1 Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-450 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-03-31 | 2013-10-28 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePIC VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/320s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lbs) | 497g (1.10 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 512 | 757 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 350 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $138 | $799 |