Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08139/081398bcc0c8f94f2393a10fc9ce1710425f2ed3" alt="Olympus E-450 front Olympus E-450 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41d7f/41d7fcbf43c59375f793394d6bee3fc7ecff0e3f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced March 2009
- Previous Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-450 versus Panasonic FS12, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-450 (10MP) and the FS12 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the E-450 (Four Thirds) and FS12 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-450 was launched very close to the FS12 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-450 scores versus the FS12 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-450 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-450 Gallery and Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Panasonic FS12
E-450 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus E-450
FS12 | E-450 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Panasonic FS12
E-450 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2009 | ![]() | April 2009 | Similar generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-450 offers exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Panasonic FS12 has sizing of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-450 versus Panasonic FS12 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-450 compared to the FS12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ff0e/5ff0ecd51c0b634d7d8312acb188214654574e56" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-450 and FS12 is 77 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d39b/6d39b2edc24484919229378f7b49ae048943c71a" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The photograph below may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-450 and FS12.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-450 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FS12 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfe67/cfe67f992890e654fccd32985d186a9748a54f3e" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d75c6/d75c6288786a28d9ef33e0e45a99d5f3139cb222" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-450 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-03-31 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 pounds) | 129g (0.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 512 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $138 | $228 |