Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. The resolution of the E-500 (8MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is fairly close but the E-500 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-500 was announced 4 years prior to the SP-565UZ which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-500 grades against the SP-565UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-500 | SP-565UZ |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-500
SP-565UZ | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2009 | ![]() | October 2005 | Newer by 39 months |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-500 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-500 offers external measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-500 compared to the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b62ac/b62ac43bd46eb363d7a96b015d584cdcd906148f" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and SP-565UZ is 70 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e22d3/e22d3c9696dde60d1b29f46e15ac0803bdc7ad69" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through a spec sheet. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-500 and SP-565UZ.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 having a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus SP-565UZ will provide you with greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/356b1/356b1146d92deca6c5ea5ec95fa985a8880c2922" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25c8e/25c8e500dba51593774ace107a15f1883201472c" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Also called | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 2.5" |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 413g (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $600 | $400 |