Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3N

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-3N front
Portability
89
Imaging
58
Features
52
Overall
55

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Released October 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Updated by Olympus E-510
Sony NEX-3N
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
  • Revealed February 2013
  • Succeeded the Sony NEX-F3
  • Renewed by Sony a5000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview

In this article, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-500 versus Sony NEX-3N, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3N (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-500 was unveiled 8 years earlier than the NEX-3N which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-500 matches up vs the NEX-3N with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony NEX-3N

 E-500 NEX-3N 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus E-500

 NEX-3N E-500 
RevealedFebruary 2013October 2005Newer by 89 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k215kClearer screen (+245k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-3N

 E-500 NEX-3N 
Focus manually More exact focus
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison

When you are going to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 comes with external dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Sony NEX-3N has sizing of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-500 versus Sony NEX-3N in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-500 and the NEX-3N.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and NEX-3N is 70 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out specs. The pic here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and NEX-3N.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony NEX-3N will produce extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Portrait photography camera
49
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
66
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
can't use external flash
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography information
Sony NEX-3N Street photography information
57
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average (479g)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
77
screen tilts
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-500
Sports photography with Sony NEX-3N
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
max frames per second low (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
resolution not great (8MP)
54
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
better than average battery pack (480 CIPA)
slow frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography information
Sony NEX-3N Travel photography information
52
lighter than average (479 grams)
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse function
resolution not great (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
71
better than average battery pack (480 per charge)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-500
Landscape photography with Sony NEX-3N
43
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
tiny screen (2.5")
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
resolution not great (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Timelapse function
70
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
good resolution (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
better than average battery pack (480 per charge)
lack of image stabilization
missing Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging information
Sony NEX-3N Vlogging information
9
no video
28
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
missing microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-500 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony NEX-3N
 Olympus E-500Sony Alpha NEX-3N
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-500 Sony Alpha NEX-3N
Also called EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2005-10-21 2013-02-25
Physical type Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4912 x 3264
Highest native ISO 400 16000
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 3 25
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Available lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 215k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 13.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 479 grams (1.06 lb) 269 grams (0.59 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 74
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 1067
Other
Battery life - 480 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $600 $399