Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched March 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-4
Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- New Model is Ricoh WG-6
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, both Waterproof digital cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-3 was revealed 10 months earlier than the WG-5 GPS which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the TG-3 grades versus the WG-5 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| TG-3 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus TG-3
| WG-5 GPS | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | March 2014 | Fresher by 10 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| TG-3 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-3 offers outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-3 versus the WG-5 GPS.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and WG-5 GPS is 90 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading specs. The visual underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and WG-5 GPS.
All in all, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of photos although you should always take the production date of the products into consideration. The older TG-3 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-3
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
good MP (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus TG-3
Street photography with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than competitors in class (247 grams)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than others (236g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Olympus TG-3 Sports photography features
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sports photography features
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
weather proofing
great battery pack (330 shots)
max frames per second low (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
weather proof
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (240 shots)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-3 Travel photography factors
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Travel photography factors
great battery pack (330 shots)
weather proofing
good MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competitors in class (247 grams)
does not contain selfie friendly display
weather proof
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery pack (240 CIPA)
more heavy than others (236g)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-3 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Landscape photography highlights
decently wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
great battery pack (330 shots)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
has manual focus
really wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
weather proof
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
terrible battery pack (240 CIPA)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-3 Vlogging factors
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Vlogging factors
decently wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than competitors in class (247 grams)
really wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone port
more heavy than others (236g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2014-03-31 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 14.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 236g (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | 240 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $350 | $500 |
