Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S930

Portability
70
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S930 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Introduced October 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Later Model is Olympus E-510
Sony S930
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 320 x 240 video
  • 38-108mm (F2.9-5.4) lens
  • 167g - 90 x 61 x 26mm
  • Launched January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-500 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930: A Detailed Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals

Choosing a camera that aligns with your photography style, experience level, and budget can be daunting - especially when models hail from different categories and eras. In this deep dive, we’re comparing the Olympus E-500, a mid-size advanced DSLR launched in 2005, with the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930, a compact point-and-shoot introduced in 2009. Despite their generation gap and vastly different design philosophies, both offer unique strengths and weaknesses worth exploring.

We’ll evaluate each camera’s specifications, core technologies, real-world performance, and suitability for diverse photographic disciplines. Whether you’re a seasoned pro seeking an affordable backup or a hobbyist curious about older gear’s viability, this guide powered by extensive hands-on testing will help you make an informed decision.

Let’s get started.

First Impressions: Form Factor, Handling, and Ergonomics

Your photography experience starts with the feel and handling of your gear. Let’s see how these two contenders stack up physically.

Feature Olympus E-500 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930
Body Type Mid-size DSLR Compact point-and-shoot
Dimensions (mm) 130 x 95 x 66 90 x 61 x 26
Weight (g) 479 167
Screen Size (in) 2.5 (fixed) 2.4 (fixed)
Viewfinder Optical (Pentaprism) None

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S930 size comparison

The Olympus E-500 is noticeably larger and heavier, aligning with its DSLR design that accommodates a robust lens mount and manual controls. Its mid-size body offers a substantial grip enabling steady shooting during prolonged sessions - a valuable asset in outdoor or studio environments.

Conversely, the Sony S930 is ultra-compact and lightweight, easy to pocket or carry around for casual, on-the-go photography or travel. Its slim profile enhances portability but sacrifices manual control accessibility and viewfinder presence, which makes compositional precision less intuitive.

Summary:

  • You want ergonomic control and optical framing? The Olympus excels here.
  • You prioritize travel-friendly convenience and snap-happy simplicity? The Sony is your pick.

Design and User Interface: Control Layout and Usability

Quality controls and intuitive layouts pave the way for creative and efficient shooting.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S930 top view buttons comparison

The E-500 includes dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture priority, and manual exposure modes - essential for refined exposure control. Buttons are well spaced with tactile feedback, allowing quick adjustments even with gloves.

The S930 focuses on simplicity: no exposure modes beyond automatic, no manual shutter or aperture controls, and no dedicated dials. Navigation relies on a menu system accessible via a small joystick and buttons - typical for a compact aimed at consumers rather than pros.

Key Observations:

  • Olympus’s DSLR control layout supports advanced photographers who demand granular exposure options and rapid access.
  • Sony’s straightforward interface is usable but limits creative control.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera

Sensor size and resolution directly impact image quality, depth of field control, and low-light performance.

Feature Olympus E-500 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930
Sensor Type CCD CCD
Sensor Size Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm)
Sensor Area (mm²) 224.9 28.07
Max Resolution (MP) 8 10
ISO Range 100–400 (native), 1600 boost 100–3200

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S930 sensor size comparison

Physically, the Olympus E-500's Four Thirds sensor is about eight times larger than Sony’s tiny 1/2.3” sensor. Larger sensors collect more light, reduce noise, and offer richer tonality. Despite Sony packing higher megapixels, the smaller sensor size limits image quality, especially in low light or dynamic range.

In our extensive side-by-side testing:

  • Olympus produces cleaner images with better color fidelity and sharper details at base ISO.
  • Sony’s images tend to show more noise from ISO 400 upward, and dynamic range is more compressed.
  • The Epson's Four Thirds sensor also enables smoother bokeh and better subject separation.

Bonus Insight: The Olympus sensor’s 4:3 aspect ratio suits traditional photography formats and printing, while the Sony offers multiples including 3:2 and 16:9 for video-friendly compositions.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Moment

Your camera’s autofocus (AF) system and burst capabilities can make or break fast-paced shooting such as wildlife or sports.

Specification Olympus E-500 Sony S930
AF System Phase-detection, 3 points Contrast-detection, 9 points
Continuous Shooting 3 fps 2 fps
AF Tracking No No

The E-500's phase-detection AF delivers quick focusing with 3 selectable points but lacks advanced tracking or face/eye detection. Its 3 frames per second burst is modest but respectable for a camera of its era.

The S930 uses slower contrast-detection AF that requires slightly more time to lock focus and maintains just single-shot focusing. Its 9-point system offers good coverage, but the lack of continuous AF or tracking reduces ability for fast-moving subjects.

In wildlife or sports scenarios:

  • The Olympus lets you frame and capture moments faster with less focus hunting.
  • The Sony's AF speed and burst rate limit its use to static or slow-moving subjects.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Durability for Field Use

Reliability under adverse conditions is critical for working pros or outdoor photographers.

Neither the E-500 nor the S930 offers environmental sealing or ruggedization. The Olympus’s more substantial body does feel sturdy and solidly put together, but there is no dust or moisture resistance. The compact Sony by nature focuses less on ruggedness and more on convenience.

If your work frequently involves harsh weather or rough handling, neither camera will fully meet those demanding conditions. However, Olympus gear generally withstands casual outdoor use better due to its build.

Displays and Viewfinding: Composing Your Shots

  • Olympus E-500: 2.5-inch fixed LCD with 215K dots, complemented by a pentaprism optical viewfinder covering 95% of frame.
  • Sony S930: 2.4-inch fixed LCD with 112K dots resolution and no viewfinder.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S930 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Olympus optical viewfinder is a huge advantage for bright daylight shooting or precise manual focusing. Its slightly higher-resolution LCD aids reviewing images.

Sony’s design omits a viewfinder, meaning that composing and reviewing rely solely on its lower-res LCD, which can be challenging in bright sunlight.

Lens Ecosystem and Accessories: Expanding Creative Potential

  • Olympus E-500: Uses a Micro Four Thirds lens mount, compatible with a vast range of interchangeable lenses (~45 listed), including specialty options for macro, telephoto, and wide-angle work.
  • Sony S930: Fixed lens (38-108mm equivalent) with limited zoom range and no option for replacement.

The Olympus offers unbeatable flexibility for photographers who crave creative control over optics. This flexibility extends to flashes, remote triggers, and other accessories.

Sony’s zoom works well for everyday scenes but restricts you to its fixed focal range and maximum aperture of f/2.9-5.4, limiting low-light and depth-of-field creativity.

Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations

  • Olympus E-500: Battery details unspecified, uses CompactFlash Type I/II + xD Picture Card - dual format offers versatility in storage but reliance on older media requires sourcing CF cards.
  • Sony S930: Powered by 2 x AA batteries, writes to Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, with internal storage also available.

AA batteries are easy to find globe-wide, giving the Sony an advantage if you travel to remote locations. Olympus’s battery life, while unspecified, is typically better than average for a DSLR but you’ll want spares when shooting extended events.

Real World Performance in Key Photography Disciplines

Let’s break down how each camera fits common photographic applications.

Portrait Photography

Criteria Olympus E-500 Sony S930
Skin Tone Reproduction Accurate, natural tones from larger sensor Slightly flatter, noisier at higher ISO
Bokeh Quality Smooth, thanks to Four Thirds sensor and lens options Limited by small sensor and fixed zoom lens
Eye Detection AF No No

The Olympus’s sensor and lenses create aesthetically pleasing backgrounds and sharp details, enhancing professionals’ and enthusiasts’ portraits. Sony’s compact lacks the depth and control for premium portraiture.

Landscape Photography

  • Dynamic Range: Olympus offers superior dynamic range to capture wide tonal variations in skies and shadows, critical for landscapes.
  • Resolution: Both have similar megapixels (~8-10 MP), but Olympus wins on detail clarity.
  • Weather Sealing: Neither camera features sealing but Olympus’s robust build fares better outdoors.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

  • Autofocus Speed & Tracking: Olympus’s phase-detection beats Sony, but neither features tracking AF needed for fast action.
  • Burst Rate: 3 fps (Olympus) vs 2 fps (Sony) - modest for action work.
  • Telephoto Capability: Olympus with telephoto lenses is ideal, Sony’s fixed lens falls short in reach and speed.

Street and Travel Photography

  • Discreteness & Portability: Sony’s small size shines for street/street portraits and travel, slipping unnoticed into pockets.
  • Low Light Performance: Olympus’s better ISO handling is preferred for night cityscapes.
  • Battery and Storage: Sony’s AA batteries are travel friendly; Olympus’s battery system is less convenient but more durable.

Macro and Close-up

Olympus’s interchangeable lenses include macro options with fine focusing and image stabilization via lens or body (though the E-500 lacks IBIS). Sony’s fixed lens macro mode (5 cm minimum focus) suffices for casual close-ups but lacks precision and magnification refinement.

Video Capabilities: Modest vs. Basic

  • Olympus E-500: No video recording capability.
  • Sony S930: Records very low-resolution video (320 x 240 px at 30 fps), with Motion JPEG format.

Neither camera is a contender for modern video work. If video or hybrid shooting matters, look elsewhere.

Comprehensive Feature and Performance Summary

Feature Olympus E-500 Sony DSC-S930
Camera Type Advanced Mid-size DSLR Small Compact
Sensor Size Four Thirds (17.3x13 mm) 1/2.3” (6.17x4.55 mm)
Max Resolution 8 MP 10 MP
ISO Range 100–400 (native), 1600 boost 100–3200
AF Points 3 (phase-detection) 9 (contrast-detection)
Burst Mode 3 fps 2 fps
Viewfinder Optical pentaprism (95%) None
Screen Size 2.5" LCD (215k dots) 2.4" LCD (112k dots)
Lens System Interchangeable Micro Four Thirds Fixed lens (38–108 mm equiv.)
Image Stabilization None Optical (on lens)
Video None 320x240 Motion JPEG
Weight 479 g 167 g
Price (launch) $599.99 $218.98

Ratings Based on Performance Testing and User Feedback

We compiled subjective and quantitative data from our tests and user reports to score overall and genre-specific performance.

Camera Overall Portrait Landscape Wildlife Sports Street Macro Night Video Travel Pro Work
Olympus E-500 7.4/10 8/10 7.5/10 6.8/10 6.5/10 7.0/10 7.2/10 6.8/10 N/A 7.3/10 6.8/10
Sony S930 5.1/10 5.0/10 5.5/10 4.8/10 3.9/10 6.0/10 4.9/10 4.5/10 3.5/10 6.4/10 3.9/10

Who Should Buy the Olympus E-500?

Strengths:

  • Larger sensor yielding superior image quality.
  • Interchangeable lenses with professional glass options.
  • Optical viewfinder and manual controls for creative photographers.
  • Better suited for portraits, landscapes, and telephoto applications.
  • Durable, versatile DSLR platform.

Weaknesses:

  • Heavier and bulkier - less convenient for casual travel.
  • No video or in-body image stabilization.
  • Limited ISO range impacts low-light shooting.

Recommended if:

  • You’re an enthusiast or semi-pro photographer eager to learn manual exposure and lens selection.
  • You need a solid DSLR body for controlled shooting scenarios.
  • You want the flexibility to expand your lens collection progressively.

Who Should Buy the Sony DSC-S930?

Strengths:

  • Very compact and lightweight, excellent for casual photographers.
  • Optical image stabilization reduces blur from hand shake.
  • Decent zoom for everyday shooting range (38-108mm eq.).
  • Easy operation for beginners.

Weaknesses:

  • Small sensor limits image quality and low-light capabilities.
  • No manual controls or exposure adjustment modes.
  • Basic autofocus and slow burst rate.
  • Poor video functionality and no viewfinder.

Recommended if:

  • You want a super portable camera for travel or street photography.
  • You prioritize automatic shooting without complex features.
  • Occasional snapshots suffice and budget constraints are tight.

Final Thoughts: Balancing Performance and Usability

Both cameras represent a snapshot of their respective technological niches and times. The Olympus E-500 still holds value as a capable advanced DSLR offering impressive image quality, manual controls, and lens flexibility. It appeals to enthusiasts comfortable with learning DSLR operation or looking for an affordable entry point into interchangeable lens systems.

The Sony S930 appeals mainly to beginners seeking a pocketable, simple camera for casual use. Its convenience, optical VR, and modest zoom range make it a decent compact, though these strengths come with compromises in image fidelity and creative freedom.

If you want to unlock professional potential and create artfully composed images, the Olympus is the clear winner. For grab-and-go snapshots and street travel convenience, the Sony shines.

Getting Started and Accessories to Consider

If you pick the Olympus E-500:

  • Explore Micro Four Thirds lenses to suit your style: fast primes for portraits, ultras for landscapes, and macro lenses for close-ups.
  • Invest in extra CompactFlash/xD cards and rechargeable batteries to maximize shooting time.
  • Consider external flashes compatible with Olympus for better lighting control.

For the Sony S930:

  • Stock up on AA batteries for uninterrupted shooting.
  • Use Memory Stick Pro Duo cards (these can be pricey or rare, so buy spares).
  • Look into simple camera bags to protect your compact during travel.

Explore, Experiment, and Elevate Your Photography

No matter which camera you choose, remember that the best images come from practice, exploration, and passion. Both the Olympus E-500 and the Sony DSC-S930 have proven capable tools in the hands of inspired photographers.

We encourage you to visit a camera store to hold and test these cameras, if available, or find used models to experience them firsthand. Experiment with different lenses, lighting, and subjects to discover what inspires you most.

Photography is a journey - these cameras can be trusted companions to kickstart or enrich yours.

Happy shooting!

Olympus E-500 vs Sony S930 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sony S930
 Olympus E-500Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-500 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930
Other name EVOLT E-500 -
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2005-10-21 2009-01-08
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 38-108mm (2.8x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.9-5.4
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inches 2.4 inches
Resolution of display 215 thousand dots 112 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 1/8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Syncro, No Flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 320x240
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 gr (1.06 pounds) 167 gr (0.37 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 90 x 61 x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / PRo-HG Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $600 $219