Olympus E-500 vs Sony T90
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38


96 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Olympus E-500 vs Sony T90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Announced October 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-500
- New Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 148g - 94 x 57 x 15mm
- Released February 2009

Olympus E-500 vs Sony T90 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-500 and Sony T90, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and T90 (12MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and T90 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.

The E-500 was brought out 4 years before the T90 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony T90 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-500 grades vs the T90 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony T90 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-500 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Sony T90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sony T90
E-500 | T90 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony T90 over the Olympus E-500
T90 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2009 | ![]() | October 2005 | Newer by 40 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sony T90
E-500 | T90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-500 vs Sony T90 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 offers outer dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) while the Sony T90 has sizing of 94mm x 57mm x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-500 and Sony T90 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-500 against the T90.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and T90 is 70 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony T90 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and T90.
As you can see, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-500 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Sony T90 will produce more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Sony T90 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sony T90 Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2005-10-21 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 215k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 479g (1.06 pounds) | 148g (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 94 x 57 x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $600 | $259 |