Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7bbb/a7bbb390f9986c1e7150b0a6b5b379be6bcbd98e" alt="Olympus E-510 front Olympus E-510 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced November 2007
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-510
- Old Model is Olympus E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-510 and Olympus VR-320, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-510 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the E-510 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-510 was released 4 years prior to the VR-320 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-510 scores against the VR-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-510 & Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-510 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Olympus VR-320
E-510 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-510
VR-320 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | ![]() | November 2007 | Newer by 44 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Olympus VR-320
E-510 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-510 has outside dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-510 and Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-510 compared to the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8bca/b8bcaef8bf38d53eb05dbf1e4096e45373f5e20c" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-510 and VR-320 is 69 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3eb0c/3eb0c1c206424ba99105edcf43018a1efcba79ed" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through technical specs. The pic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-510 and VR-320.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-510 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will result in more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged E-510 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e3cc/1e3cce43d082b6c90b78bbff6db7a113f49e80e8" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ce34/7ce34080dc7dc75f573973b33ca40d1e36702171" alt="Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-510 | Olympus VR-320 |
Alternative name | EVOLT E-510 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2007-11-23 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 490g (1.08 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $550 | $179 |