Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-330
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed November 2007
- Other Name is EVOLT E-510
- Previous Model is Olympus E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-330, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-510 (10MP) and VR-330 (14MP) and the E-510 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-510 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the VR-330 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-510 grades versus the VR-330 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-510 and Olympus VR-330. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-510 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Olympus VR-330
E-510 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-510
VR-330 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | November 2007 | Newer by 39 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Olympus VR-330
E-510 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-510 has outer measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-330 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-510 and the VR-330.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-510 and VR-330 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specifications. The image below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-510 and VR-330.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-510 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus VR-330 will resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-510 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-510 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-510 | Olympus VR-330 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-510 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2007-11-23 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 490g (1.08 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $550 | $220 |