Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FX78
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced November 2007
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-510
- Old Model is Olympus E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX77
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus E-510 versus Panasonic FX78, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-510 (10MP) and the FX78 (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-510 (Four Thirds) and FX78 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-510 was launched 4 years before the FX78 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-510 matches up versus the FX78 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-510 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-510 Gallery and Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Panasonic FX78
E-510 | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus E-510
FX78 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | November 2007 | Newer by 38 months | |
Display sizing | 3.5" | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Panasonic FX78
E-510 | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-510 enjoys outside measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX78 has proportions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-510 versus Panasonic FX78 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-510 and the FX78.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-510 and FX78 is 69 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-510 and FX78.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-510 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FX78 will offer more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged E-510 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-510 | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2007-11-23 | 2011-01-25 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 490 grams (1.08 pounds) | 142 grams (0.31 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 442 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $550 | $210 |