Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Olympus TG-830 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
40
Overall
40

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Announced August 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-510
Olympus TG-830 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
  • Revealed January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview

Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-520 was released 5 years prior to the TG-830 iHS and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-520 scores versus the TG-830 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS

 E-520 TG-830 iHS 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-520

 TG-830 iHS E-520 
RevealedJanuary 2013August 2008More recent by 53 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-830 iHS

 E-520 TG-830 iHS 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison

If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 provides external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-520 vs the TG-830 iHS.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and TG-830 iHS is 68 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out technical specs. The graphic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and TG-830 iHS.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-520 because of its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will show more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The older E-520 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-830 iHS Portrait photography features
59
focusing manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
35
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers face detection focusing
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography features
Olympus TG-830 iHS Street photography features
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-830 iHS as a Sports photography camera
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great battery power (650 per charge)
comes with phase detect AF
slow fps (4.0 fps)
low megapixels (10MP)
48
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proof
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-520
Travel photography with Olympus TG-830 iHS
52
great battery power (650 shots)
has built in flash
no Timelapse mode
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
67
environment proof
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-520
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-830 iHS
58
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (650 shots)
tiny screen (2.7")
low megapixels (10MP)
no Timelapse mode
45
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
environment proof
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging info
Olympus TG-830 iHS Vlogging info
9
can't shoot video
33
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
 Olympus E-520Olympus TG-830 iHS
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-520 Olympus TG-830 iHS
Class Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Announced 2008-08-20 2013-01-08
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552 gr (1.22 lbs) 214 gr (0.47 lbs)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 pictures 300 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $400 $0