Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-520 was released 5 years prior to the TG-830 iHS and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-520 scores versus the TG-830 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-520 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-520
TG-830 iHS | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 53 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-520 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 provides external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-520 vs the TG-830 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd569/bd56905a9ea639fa9396284c3a4ed5dea13448cd" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and TG-830 iHS is 68 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38642/3864247be46ee77464903140c22cee4c3c176445" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out technical specs. The graphic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and TG-830 iHS.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-520 because of its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will show more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The older E-520 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e989c/e989c05068e0e81eb13aa9909b4fccc0e1683d3e" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bf92/8bf9250b47f01b74731587015b44274b00f02d58" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lbs) | 214 gr (0.47 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $400 | $0 |