Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Here is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS200, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-520 was released 10 years earlier than the ZS200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-520 scores versus the ZS200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-520 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-520
ZS200 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | August 2008 | Fresher by 115 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Sharper display (+1010k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS200
E-520 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 has got physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-520 against the ZS200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and ZS200 is 68 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and ZS200.
To sum up, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-520 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older E-520 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lb) | 340g (0.75 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | 370 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $400 | $800 |