Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front
Portability
86
Imaging
54
Features
66
Overall
58

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Announced August 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-510
Panasonic ZS200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
  • Introduced February 2018
  • Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
  • Older Model is Panasonic ZS100
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview

Here is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS200, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-520 was released 10 years earlier than the ZS200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-520 scores versus the ZS200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic ZS200

 E-520 ZS200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-520

 ZS200 E-520 
IntroducedFebruary 2018August 2008Fresher by 115 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1240k230kSharper display (+1010k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS200

 E-520 ZS200 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 has got physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-520 against the ZS200.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and ZS200 is 68 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and ZS200.

To sum up, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-520 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older E-520 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography details
Panasonic ZS200 Portrait photography details
59
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
supports RAW formats
low resolution (10MP)
65
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
offers face detect focusing
supports RAW files
external flash not possible
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic ZS200 as a Street photography camera
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
77
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
supports RAW files
has focus by touch
fixed screen
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 Sports photography details
Panasonic ZS200 Sports photography details
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
great battery pack (650 CIPA)
has phase detect auto focus
slow fps (4.0 fps)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
70
amazing zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
silent shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
offers tracking focus
better than average battery pack (370 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography features
Panasonic ZS200 Travel photography features
52
great battery pack (650 per charge)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low resolution (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
76
better than average battery pack (370 CIPA)
supports bluetooth
has focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great zoom (360mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography advice
Panasonic ZS200 Landscape photography advice
58
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
great battery pack (650 shots)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
70
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (370 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging info
Panasonic ZS200 Vlogging info
9
no video
35
reasonably wide (24mm)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS200
 Olympus E-520Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-520 Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
Otherwise known as - Lumix DC-TZ200
Class Entry-Level DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2008-08-20 2018-02-13
Physical type Compact SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - Venus Engine
Sensor type CMOS MOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Max enhanced ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW images
Lowest enhanced ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 49
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus range - 5cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 1,240k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,330k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.53x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Max silent shutter speed - 1/16000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 6.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Max video resolution None 3840x2160
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 552g (1.22 lb) 340g (0.75 lb)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 photographs 370 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible)
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $400 $800