Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH22
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS33
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH22, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and FH22 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FH22 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-520 was launched 16 months earlier than the FH22 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH22 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-520 matches up versus the FH22 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FH22
E-520 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus E-520
FH22 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | August 2008 | More recent by 16 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FH22
E-520 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 has external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Panasonic FH22 has measurements of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH22 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-520 compared to the FH22.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and FH22 is 68 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and FH22.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-520 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FH22 will give more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lbs) | 170 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $400 | $200 |