Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a81b/6a81b74be2fc2f5b005db0ba199900d1cad3b423" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 front"
91 Imaging
33 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched May 2009
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS1, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the ZS1 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and ZS1 (1/2.5") boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-520 was unveiled 8 months prior to the ZS1 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-520 matches up vs the ZS1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic ZS1
E-520 | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus E-520
ZS1 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2009 | ![]() | August 2008 | Fresher by 8 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS1
E-520 | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 enjoys outer dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS1 has dimensions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-520 compared to the ZS1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39ed6/39ed631caf28c9f00fce7cb5b9e2ba25257cbb59" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and ZS1 is 68 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/653a4/653a4d2d12f9356af8683283c27c9f297cfdb9ae" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through specifications. The visual here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and ZS1.
Plainly, both of those cameras have the same megapixels albeit different sensor sizing. The E-520 has the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallower DOF easier. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93ac0/93ac03533a135f1f4fe28c2cb5df37c69c00433c" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6176f/6176fdd3a150089d94c091cec9920c7920e56424" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lb) | 229 grams (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $400 | $0 |