Olympus E-520 vs Pentax 645Z
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
49 Imaging
80 Features
74 Overall
77
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax 645Z Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released August 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Released April 2014
- Older Model is Pentax 645D
Photography Glossary Olympus E-520 vs Pentax 645Z Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-520 versus Pentax 645Z, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Pro DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and 645Z (51MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and 645Z (Medium format) feature different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-520 was unveiled 6 years before the 645Z and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax 645Z being a Large SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-520 scores vs the 645Z in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-520 vs Pentax 645Z Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 & Pentax 645Z. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Pentax 645Z Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Pentax 645Z
| E-520 | 645Z |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax 645Z over the Olympus E-520
| 645Z | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2014 |  | August 2008 | Fresher by 68 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3.2" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Pentax 645Z
| E-520 | 645Z | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax 645Z Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 offers exterior measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Pentax 645Z has sizing of 156mm x 117mm x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") having a weight of 1550 grams (3.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-520 versus Pentax 645Z in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-520 compared to the 645Z.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and 645Z is 68 and 49 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax 645Z Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The photograph here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and 645Z.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-520 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Pentax 645Z will resolve extra detail having an extra 41MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax 645Z Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax 645Z Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Pentax 645Z | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus E-520 | Pentax 645Z |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Pro DSLR |
| Released | 2008-08-20 | 2014-04-15 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Large SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | PRIME III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Medium format |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 44 x 33mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 51 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 8256 x 6192 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 204800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 27 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax 645AF2 |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 6 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3.2" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.85x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/125 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 552 grams (1.22 pounds) | 1550 grams (3.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | 101 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 26.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 14.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | 548 | 4505 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 shots | 650 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
| Card slots | Single | Two |
| Pricing at launch | $400 | $5,024 |