Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A33

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Sony SLT-A33 front
Portability
67
Imaging
54
Features
80
Overall
64

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A33 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Launched August 2008
  • Superseded the Olympus E-510
Sony A33
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Released August 2010
  • Later Model is Sony A35
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A33 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-520 vs Sony A33, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and A33 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and A33 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-520 was released 24 months before the A33 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).

Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-520 matches up versus the A33 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony A33

 E-520 A33 

Reasons to pick Sony A33 over the Olympus E-520

 A33 E-520 
ReleasedAugust 2010August 2008More recent by 24 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution921k230kClearer display (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony A33

 E-520 A33 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A33 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 enjoys external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Sony A33 has proportions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-520 vs Sony A33 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-520 vs the A33.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A33 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and A33 is 68 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A33 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A33 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specs. The graphic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and A33.

All in all, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-520 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A33 will give you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A33 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A33 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A33 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography details
Sony A33 Portrait photography details
59
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
72
has manual focus
resolution is good (14MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography features
Sony A33 Street photography features
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
76
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
Sony A33 as a Sports photography camera
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
better than average battery (650 per charge)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
max frames per second very slow (4.0 frames per second)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
67
image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports phase detect AF
terrible battery pack (340 per charge)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography factors
Sony A33 Travel photography factors
52
better than average battery (650 shots)
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse function
low resolution sensor (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
61
resolution is good (14MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
lack of Timelapse function
terrible battery pack (340 shots)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-520
Landscape photography with Sony A33
58
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (650 shots)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
does not have Timelapse function
67
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
terrible battery pack (340 shots)
lack of Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging information
Sony A33 Vlogging information
9
no video
77
selfie friendly display
image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A33 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Sony A33
 Olympus E-520Sony SLT-A33
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-520 Sony SLT-A33
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2008-08-20 2010-08-24
Physical type Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames per sec 7.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (@ ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552g (1.22 lbs) 500g (1.10 lbs)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 70
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 22.8
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 12.6
DXO Low light rating 548 591
Other
Battery life 650 pictures 340 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Price at release $400 $230