Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A35

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Sony SLT-A35 front
Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
70
Overall
62

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A35 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Revealed August 2008
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-510
Sony A35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 415g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Replaced the Sony A33
  • Updated by Sony A37
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A35 Overview

Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-520 vs Sony A35, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and A35 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and A35 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-520 was brought out 4 years earlier than the A35 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact SLR).

Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-520 scores vs the A35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony A35

 E-520 A35 

Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Olympus E-520

 A35 E-520 
LaunchedSeptember 2011August 2008Fresher by 37 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution921k230kSharper screen (+691k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony A35

 E-520 A35 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 comes with exterior measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Sony A35 has dimensions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-520 vs Sony A35 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-520 versus the A35.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A35 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and A35 is 68 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The visual underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and A35.

All in all, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-520 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Sony A35 will give extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-520
Portrait photography with Sony A35
59
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
74
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
provides face detect focus
delivers RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography highlights
Sony A35 Street photography highlights
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
71
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition (415g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-520
Sports photography with Sony A35
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
great battery life (650 CIPA)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
low frames per second (4.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with phase detect auto focus
continuous shooting slow (6.0 frames per second)
low battery life (440 shots)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography factors
Sony A35 Travel photography factors
52
great battery life (650 CIPA)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
59
lighter than competition (415g)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
low battery life (440 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A35 as a Landscape photography camera
58
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
great battery life (650 per charge)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
no Time Lapse function
69
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
low battery life (440 per charge)
no Time Lapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging info
Sony A35 Vlogging info
9
can't record video
36
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have mic socket
lighter than competition (415g)
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Sony A35
 Olympus E-520Sony SLT-A35
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-520 Sony SLT-A35
Type Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2008-08-20 2011-09-20
Physical type Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 12.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 552g (1.22 pounds) 415g (0.91 pounds)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 74
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 23.3
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 12.7
DXO Low light score 548 763
Other
Battery life 650 pictures 440 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $400 $598