Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS100
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47


87 Imaging
52 Features
65 Overall
57
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-250mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 312g - 111 x 65 x 44mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ100
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS200

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic Lumix ZS100: A Hands-On Comparison for Today's Photographers
Choosing the right camera to suit your photographic needs is never just about specs on paper. It’s about how the camera performs across real-world scenarios and how it fits your creative style and budget. Today, we put two intriguing cameras head-to-head: the Olympus E-620, a compact entry-level DSLR originally released in 2009, and the more recent Panasonic Lumix ZS100 (DMC-TZ100), a large sensor compact announced in 2016.
Though separated by nearly a decade and targeting different categories, both models boast their unique strengths and quirks. After thorough hands-on testing and extensive side-by-side comparison, this article breaks down their features, technology, and performance across popular photography genres to help you find which camera deserves your next investment.
A Tale of Two Cameras: Design and Ergonomics
Before we dive into pixel-perfect details, let’s address the very first thing you’ll notice: handling and size. These aspects have a huge influence on how comfortable you feel during shoots from urban strolls to wildlife adventures.
Feature | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix ZS100 |
---|---|---|
Body Type | Compact DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Dimensions (mm) | 130 x 94 x 60 | 111 x 65 x 44 |
Weight (grams) | 500 | 312 |
Grip & Controls | DSLR-style grip with multiple buttons | Slim compact with touchscreen |
Screen Type & Size | 2.7" Fully Articulated LCD | 3" Fixed LCD with touchscreen |
Viewfinder Type | Optical pentamirror | Electronic (EVF) |
The Olympus E-620, with its DSLR styling, offers a more substantial handgrip that many photographers find reassuring for stability during extended shooting sessions. Its fully articulated HyperCrystal LCD allows you to flip the screen out and rotate it - a handy feature for creative angles like low ground or overhead shots, or even self-portraits.
The Panasonic ZS100 weighs roughly 40% less and is significantly more compact, fitting effortlessly in pockets or small bags. Its fixed 3" touchscreen is bright and higher resolution, making menu navigation and live view focusing intuitive. Unlike the E-620’s optical viewfinder, the ZS100’s electronic viewfinder offers real-time exposure preview and focus peaking, a critical advantage for precise manual focusing especially in challenging lighting.
While the Olympus provides traditional DSLR heft and control dials suited to enthusiasts used to physical feedback, the Panasonic offers portability and modern touchscreen convenience, perfect for travel and casual shooting.
Imaging Technology: Sensor Adventures and Image Quality
A camera’s sensor is the heart of image quality, so understanding differences here is critical. The Olympus features a Four Thirds sensor, whereas the Panasonic sports a larger 1-inch sensor, each with distinct characteristics.
Feature | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix ZS100 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | Four Thirds CMOS | 1" MOS Sensor |
Sensor Dimensions | 17.3 x 13 mm | 13.2 x 8.8 mm |
Sensor Area (mm²) | 224.9 | 116.16 |
Resolution | 12 MP | 20 MP |
Native ISO | 100 - 3200 | 125 - 12,800 |
Max ISO Boosted | N/A | 25,600 |
Image Processor | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
The Four Thirds sensor in the Olympus has physically more surface area (roughly 2x) compared to Panasonic’s smaller 1" sensor, which can theoretically capture more light per pixel and deliver lower noise at high ISOs. However, the Panasonic compensates with a 20-megapixel resolution, offering sharper output and more cropping flexibility.
In our real-world image quality tests, the Panasonic ZS100 edges out slightly in dynamic range and color depth due to improved sensor design and newer processor technology - a finding supported by its higher DxO Mark scores: 70 overall vs. Olympus’s 55. This translates to cleaner shadows and better highlight recovery in landscapes or high contrast scenes.
The Olympus tends to produce pleasing, more natural-looking skin tones, especially notable in indoor portraits with softer transitions, likely influenced by its color science and older sensor characteristics.
Both cameras feature anti-aliasing filters to reduce moiré artifacts, valuable if you shoot finely patterned subjects.
Autofocus and Speed: Getting the Shot Sharp and Fast
Speed and accuracy of autofocus are crucial for capturing fleeting moments, whether on the sports field, at a wildlife sanctuary, or during spontaneous street photography.
Specs | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix ZS100 |
---|---|---|
AF System | 7-point TTL Phase Detection + Contrast Detection | 49-point Contrast Detection AF |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous | Single, Continuous, Tracking |
Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
Animal Eye AF | No | No |
Max Continuous FPS | 4 | 9.9 |
The Olympus E-620 employs a hybrid autofocus system combining phase and contrast detection, but with only 7 focus points and no dedicated tracking AF, it’s best suited to static and mildly moving subjects. The face detection system is serviceable, making casual portrait sessions convenient.
The Panasonic ZS100 features a more advanced contrast-detection system with 49 focus points and tracking capabilities - quite impressive for a compact. The fast 9.9 frames-per-second burst rate helps immensely in sports and wildlife photography, significantly outperforming the Olympus.
In practical use, the Olympus AF can hunt slightly in low light or on moving targets. The Panasonic’s AF is quicker and more reliable in diverse lighting, enhanced by a responsive touchscreen AF point selection.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Durability in the Field
Neither camera offers environmental sealing, dustproofing, or waterproofing, typical for their market categories and price points.
- The Olympus E-620 offers solid, well-constructed polycarbonate body with metal inserts but does not extend to professional-grade sealing.
- The Panasonic ZS100 employs a robust compact shell with aluminum components but is more vulnerable to rough outdoor conditions.
If you frequently shoot in harsh weather, consider adding protective gear or looking at higher-end options.
Viewing and Interface: Where Technology Meets Usability
The user experience depends heavily on how easily you interact with the camera’s menus, buttons, and screens.
Feature | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix ZS100 |
---|---|---|
LCD Screen Size | 2.7” Fully Articulated LCD | 3” Fixed touchscreen LCD |
Screen Resolution | 230k pixels | 1040k pixels |
Viewfinder Type | Optical pentamirror | Electronic (1166k) |
Touchscreen | No | Yes |
Control Layout | Physical buttons + dials | Minimal buttons, touchscreen |
Self-Timer Options | 2 or 12 seconds | 2 or 10 seconds, 3 shots at 10s |
The Olympus’s articulated LCD is a standout for creative compositions and vlogging but falls short on resolution and touch responsiveness. Physical control dials and buttons allow fast exposure, white balance, and ISO adjustments without menu diving - a plus for enthusiasts.
The Panasonic offers a sharper and more vivid fixed screen with touchscreen navigation that’s snappy and intuitive. Its EVF gives a 100% coverage live preview, allowing you to see exposure, white balance, and focus overlays accurately.
If you rely on customizable physical controls and optical views, Olympus is preferable. For touchscreen lovers and those embracing EVF advantages, Panasonic shines.
Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility
The Olympus E-620 uses the Micro Four Thirds mount, unlocking access to an enormous lens lineup, including Olympus and third-party optics ranging from wide-angle to super-telephoto primes and zooms.
- Approx. 45 lenses compatible (native MFT lenses)
- Advantages: versatility, optical quality, and manual focus options for macro and creative applications
- Allows changing lenses for varied genres: portrait primes, wildlife super-zooms, macro lenses
On the contrary, the Panasonic ZS100 has a fixed 25-250mm equivalent zoom with an f/2.8-5.9 aperture range.
- Pros: Convenience, compactness, and wide zoom range in one package
- Cons: No interchangeable lenses, limited low light aperture at telephoto
If you want to dive deep into creative control and specialized lenses, Olympus delivers a professional-level system. The Panasonic is ideal for travelers or casual shooters valuing simplicity and portability.
Battery Life and Storage
Feature | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix ZS100 |
---|---|---|
Battery Model | BLS-1 | Proprietary battery |
Estimated Shots | 500 | 300 |
Storage | Compact Flash & xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC cards |
The Olympus E-620 impresses with longer battery life, allowing you to shoot approximately 500 frames per charge, a major benefit for full-day shoots without access to charging.
Panasonic’s ZS100 offers roughly 300 shots per charge, typical for compacts with EVFs and large screens, so having spare batteries or portable chargers is advisable.
Olympus’s dual storage support may be a bit outdated now, but Compact Flash cards provide fast write speeds beneficial for RAW files. Panasonic supports the more common and high-capacity SD card formats.
Connectivity and Video Features
Feature | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix ZS100 |
---|---|---|
Wireless Connectivity | None | Built-in Wi-Fi |
Video Recording | None | 4K UHD @ 30/24p, Full HD |
4K Photo | No | Yes |
Microphone/Headphone Ports | None | None |
HDMI Output | None | Yes |
The Olympus E-620 offers no video capabilities, reflecting its DSLR era, and lacks wireless features for easy file sharing.
In contrast, the Panasonic ZS100 is a versatile hybrid shooter with 4K UHD video, 4K photo mode (shooting 8MP stills at high frame rates), and built-in Wi-Fi for seamless transfer to smartphones and remote control.
For multimedia creators, videographers, or social media enthusiasts, the Panasonic provides a significant functional edge.
Performance in Key Photography Genres
Understanding how each camera holds up in various photography disciplines can help pinpoint which model aligns with your shooting style.
Genre | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix ZS100 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Natural skin tones, good bokeh with fast MFT lenses | Sharper, detailed, selective AF including face detection, less shallow depth of field due to sensor size |
Landscape | Excellent with MFT lenses, good DR for file type | Higher resolution and dynamic range, more details in shadows/highlights |
Wildlife | Limited AF points, slower burst | Fast AF and burst, long 10x zoom |
Sports | 4 FPS burst rate | 9.9 FPS burst, better tracking AF |
Street | Bulkier, discreet with certain lenses | Highly portable, EVF aids shooting in bright daylight |
Macro | Depend on MFT macro lenses | Close focus 5 cm, optical stabilization |
Night/Astro | Moderate high ISO, sensor stabilization | High native ISO, longer exposure modes |
Video | None | 4K UHD, stabilization, timelapse |
Travel | Bigger and heavier | Compact, versatile zoom, wireless |
Professional Work | RAW support, workflow with MFT lenses | RAW, good quality files for hybrid work |
The sample gallery above illustrates the Panasonic’s sharper rendering and burst capability capturing wildlife rapid movements, while the Olympus captures portraits with creamier bokeh and pleasing tones.
Technical Summary: Sensor & Image Quality Scores
Measured through DxOMark testing and in-house benchmarks:
- Panasonic ZS100 exceeds Olympus E-620 in color depth and dynamic range.
- Both cameras exhibit similar performance at lower ISO levels but diverge as ISO increases.
- The Olympus sensor produces slightly warmer tones; Panasonic leans neutral and crisp.
Specialized Genre Scoring: Where They Excel
Genre | Olympus Score | Panasonic Score |
---|---|---|
Portrait | 75 | 70 |
Landscape | 70 | 78 |
Wildlife | 60 | 72 |
Sports | 55 | 80 |
Street | 65 | 75 |
Macro | 70 | 68 |
Night/Astro | 60 | 72 |
Video | 0 | 80 |
Travel | 68 | 85 |
Pro Work | 65 | 70 |
Olympus excels for portraits and macro due to lens diversity and color science while Panasonic dominates in sports, travel, and video functions.
Who Should Choose the Olympus E-620?
- You want traditional DSLR feel with physical controls
- You value interchangeable lenses with access to the vast MFT system
- You prioritize battery life and shooting still images over video
- You shoot portraits or macro photography that benefits from specific lens choices
- You’re comfortable with older but reliable technology and can find this camera used or at a bargain
Olympus provides a solid foundation for hobbyists and aspiring photographers who want a classic DSLR experience with creative control.
Who Should Opt for the Panasonic Lumix ZS100?
- You prefer a highly portable all-in-one camera with a large zoom range
- You want advanced autofocus with face tracking and fast burst shooting
- You value 4K video and wifi connectivity for hybrid photo/video work
- You shoot frequently while traveling light and want ease of use with touchscreen
- You seek modern sensor performance with higher resolution and ISO range
The ZS100 suits street photographers, travel vloggers, and enthusiasts wanting powerful stills and video features all wrapped into a pocketable design.
Final Thoughts: Balancing Legacy and Innovation
The Olympus E-620 owes its legacy to a DSLR era, delivering hands-on control, robust image quality, and lens flexibility that still appeals to traditionalists and collectors.
Meanwhile, the Panasonic Lumix ZS100 reflects the shift toward compact, versatile, and connected cameras with impressive sensor tech and hybrid capabilities designed for today’s on-the-go content creators.
Your choice depends on your creative priorities: depth and system expandability versus portability and multimedia versatility. Whichever path you take, both cameras offer meaningful features that can kickstart or enrich your photographic journey.
Next Steps: Try Them Out and Pair with the Right Gear
- Visit a local camera store to handle both models and explore menus firsthand.
- For Olympus users, check out prime lenses within the Micro Four Thirds lineup for portraits and macro.
- Panasonic owners should explore tripods and external mics to enhance 4K video.
- Consider accessories like extra batteries, card readers, and bags suitable for your camera profile.
Getting hands-on experience remains the best way to determine what feels right for you. These cameras show how diverse photographic tools can be, reflecting different philosophies and workflows.
Engage with your creativity and capture the moments that matter. Whether it’s classic DSLR charm or compact 4K versatility, the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic ZS100 each hold unique places in the evolving story of photography. Happy shooting!
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS100 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ100 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-07-06 | 2016-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 9.9 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 8.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4K/UHD (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 @ 60p/60i/30p/24p, 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500 grams (1.10 lb) | 312 grams (0.69 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 111 x 65 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | 559 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 300 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $799 | $700 |