Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Successor is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-400 was revealed 7 years earlier than the E-PM2 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-400 scores vs the E-PM2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus E-PM2
E-400 | E-PM2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus E-400
E-PM2 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | ![]() | September 2006 | More modern by 81 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+245k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-PM2
E-400 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 offers external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PM2 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-400 vs the E-PM2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2feda/2feda5366ded7dce00bb2de648ceeb20c2ccb22b" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and E-PM2 is 77 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa14d/aa14db529f3510098176056f76be2923dea9fbb9" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out specs. The pic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and E-PM2.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus E-PM2 to produce greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-400 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/096db/096dbc88691d690604281a62b16233afda97f000" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61f0b/61f0b8f3fa139f4d25f9b8bf1199287c98301439" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2013-05-21 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $599 | $448 |