Olympus E-620 vs Sony A290
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A230
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-620 vs Sony A290 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-620 and Sony A290, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the A290 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and A290 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-620 was introduced 11 months before the A290 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-620 scores versus the A290 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-620 vs Sony A290 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony A290
| E-620 | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus E-620
| A290 | E-620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 11 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony A290
| E-620 | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 offers outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Sony A290 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Olympus E-620 and Sony A290 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-620 versus the A290.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and A290 is 71 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to see the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The image below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and A290.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-620 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony A290 will resolve extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A290 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2010-06-09 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Available lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | None |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 500 grams (1.10 lbs) | 549 grams (1.21 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 55 | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | 615 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | 290 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $799 | $600 |