Clicky

Sony S2000 vs Sony W320

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Sony S2000 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Released January 2010
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sony S2000 vs Sony W320 Overview

Here, we are analyzing the Sony S2000 vs Sony W320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are sold by Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the S2000 (10MP) and W320 (14MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The S2000 was revealed at a similar time to the W320 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the S2000 grades against the W320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Sony W320

 S2000 W320 
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sony S2000

 W320 S2000 

Common features in the Sony S2000 and Sony W320

 S2000 W320 
AnnouncedJanuary 2010January 2010Similar age
Manual focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Sony S2000 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Sony S2000 offers outside dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Sony W320 has sizing of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Analyze the Sony S2000 vs Sony W320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the S2000 compared to the W320.

Sony S2000 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the S2000 and W320 is 93 and 97 respectively.

Sony S2000 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Sony S2000 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by checking specifications. The picture below will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S2000 and W320.

Plainly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony W320 to resolve greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively.

Sony S2000 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Sony S2000 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Sony S2000 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sony S2000 Portrait photography highlights
Sony W320 Portrait photography highlights
19
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
28
MP count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Sony S2000 Street photography highlights
Sony W320 Street photography highlights
46
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
48
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sony S2000 Sports photography factors
Sony W320 Sports photography factors
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,200s)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
26
MP count good (14 megapixels)
low fps (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Sony S2000 Travel photography highlights
Sony W320 Travel photography highlights
50
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse recording
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
66
MP count good (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Sony S2000 Landscape photography information
Sony W320 Landscape photography information
27
screen is a good size (3 inches)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
33
decently wide (26mm)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Sony S2000
Vlogging with Sony W320
21
wide angle not fantastic (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external mic port
26
decently wide (26mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sony S2000 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony S2000 and Sony W320
 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Manufacturer Sony Sony
Model type Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Category Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Released 2010-01-07 2010-01-07
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Bionz -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3456 x 2592 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 33-105mm (3.2x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing range 5cm 4cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 seconds 1 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1200 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.30 m 4.80 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 167g (0.37 lbs) 117g (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $225 $269