Olympus E-620 vs Zeiss ZX1
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
67 Imaging
79 Features
62 Overall
72
Olympus E-620 vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Announced September 2018
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-620 vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-620 vs Zeiss ZX1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Zeiss. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and ZX1 (Full frame) offer totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-620 was manufactured 10 years before the ZX1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Zeiss ZX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-620 scores versus the ZX1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-620 vs Zeiss ZX1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 & Zeiss ZX1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Zeiss ZX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Zeiss ZX1
| E-620 | ZX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Olympus E-620
| ZX1 | E-620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2018 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 112 months |
| Display dimensions | 4.34" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+1.64") |
| Display resolution | 2765k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+2535k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Zeiss ZX1
| E-620 | ZX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Olympus E-620 vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 offers outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Zeiss ZX1 has sizing of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 vs Zeiss ZX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-620 and the ZX1.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and ZX1 is 71 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and ZX1.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-620 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Zeiss ZX1 will provide greater detail due to its extra 25MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The older E-620 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-620 vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-620 vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Zeiss ZX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Zeiss |
| Model | Olympus E-620 | Zeiss ZX1 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-07-06 | 2018-09-27 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 37MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 7488 x 4992 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 51200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | 255 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 35mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2-22 |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 4.34 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 2,765k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 6,221k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 500 grams (1.10 lb) | 800 grams (1.76 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | 512GB internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $799 | - |
