Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 6020
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 6020, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof and both are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the 6020 (13MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FE-4000 was unveiled 6 months earlier than the 6020 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the FE-4000 scores versus the 6020 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus 6020
| FE-4000 | 6020 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus FE-4000
| 6020 | FE-4000 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus 6020
| FE-4000 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2009 |  | February 2010 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys outer measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has proportions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 6020 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the FE-4000 versus the 6020.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and 6020 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor measurements just by going through technical specs. The graphic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4000 and 6020.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Olympus 6020 to show greater detail having an extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots much more aggressively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also referred to as | X-925 | mju Tough 6020 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136 grams (0.30 lb) | 122 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $279 |