Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-870
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also Known as X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Older Model is Olympus TG-860
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus TG-870, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact and both are created by Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FE-4000 was unveiled 7 years before the TG-870 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the FE-4000 grades versus the TG-870 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4000 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus TG-870
| FE-4000 | TG-870 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus FE-4000
| TG-870 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2016 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 78 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Olympus TG-870
| FE-4000 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys outer dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-4000 versus Olympus TG-870 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the FE-4000 compared to the TG-870.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4000 and TG-870 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and TG-870.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-870 to result in extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older FE-4000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-4000 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Also Known as | X-925 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2016-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136 grams (0.30 lbs) | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $130 | $280 |