Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-4030 was introduced 4 years prior to the TG-630 iHS which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the FE-4030 scores vs the TG-630 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4030 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| FE-4030 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus FE-4030
| TG-630 iHS | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| FE-4030 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4030 comes with exterior measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-630 iHS has sizing of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the FE-4030 and the TG-630 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4030 and TG-630 iHS is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specifications. The picture here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4030 and TG-630 iHS.
Plainly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus FE-4030 to offer you more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged FE-4030 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 146 grams (0.32 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $130 | $200 |