Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df25a/df25aa9816ff75de9ec5c01cb9e2891c99ee04df" alt="Olympus FE-4030 front Olympus FE-4030 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddca4/ddca4949f4a1b222603507f1ac54d6ef4e178367" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 front"
90 Imaging
54 Features
70 Overall
60
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Launched January 2017
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the GX850 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the FE-4030 (1/2.3") and GX850 (Four Thirds) provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The FE-4030 was launched 8 years earlier than the GX850 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GX850 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the FE-4030 matches up versus the GX850 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4030 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Panasonic GX850 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Panasonic GX850
FE-4030 | GX850 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX850 over the Olympus FE-4030
GX850 | FE-4030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2017 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 85 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Panasonic GX850
FE-4030 | GX850 |
---|
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4030 provides outer measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GX850 has measurements of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the FE-4030 vs the GX850.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31ec0/31ec0c38f9f54b882c1d06cf435aadbe42c8a8d4" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4030 and GX850 is 95 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26716/267169576ea52022f8cb0993a650012856b43760" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing specs. The graphic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-4030 and GX850.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The FE-4030 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic GX850 will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older FE-4030 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9f8a/c9f8ad00a445faa315a8d57a3964978b75b698c0" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9679/e96793bd83d0f02caabc23cfacbc107c815fab8b" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic GX850 Specifications
Olympus FE-4030 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2017-01-04 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3448 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/500 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 17 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 20 Mbps, MP4, H.264 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 146 gr (0.32 lbs) | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 586 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 210 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 sec, 3 images/10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $130 | $548 |