Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30W
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Ricoh CX4 and Ricoh WG-30W, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and WG-30W (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe CX4 was revealed 5 years prior to the WG-30W and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the CX4 matches up versus the WG-30W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX4 & Ricoh WG-30W. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| CX4 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Ricoh CX4
| WG-30W | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2014 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 50 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Ricoh WG-30W
| CX4 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX4 provides outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30W has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX4 and Ricoh WG-30W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the CX4 and the WG-30W.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the CX4 and WG-30W is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing just by reading technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the CX4 and WG-30W.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-30W to offer more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The older CX4 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-08-19 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-100 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $211 | $280 |