Olympus FE-45 vs Sony H200
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus FE-45 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 62 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Released January 2013
Olympus FE-45 vs Sony H200 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus FE-45 vs Sony H200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the FE-45 (10MP) and H200 (20MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FE-45 was released 5 years before the H200 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-45 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the FE-45 matches up versus the H200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus FE-45 vs Sony H200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-45 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The complete galleries are available at Olympus FE-45 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-45 over the Sony H200
FE-45 | H200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus FE-45
H200 | FE-45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-45 and Sony H200
FE-45 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-45 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-45 has got physical dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has sizing of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-45 vs Sony H200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the FE-45 against the H200.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the FE-45 and H200 is 95 and 67 respectively.
Olympus FE-45 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-45 and H200.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Sony H200 to render more detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged FE-45 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-45 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-45 vs Sony H200 Specifications
Olympus FE-45 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus FE-45 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 2920 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 20cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 142g (0.31 lb) | 530g (1.17 lb) |
Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Form of battery | - | AA |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $130 | $250 |