Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7eb5/d7eb58ad0dd4eba3b999b824f84ce7ac6eb35d7c" alt="Olympus FE-5010 front Olympus FE-5010 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27fce/27fced1b30df29f9c1d9c26f1646ff64695d521a" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 front"
90 Imaging
54 Features
62 Overall
57
Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 266g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Announced February 2016
- Previous Model is Panasonic GF7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the FE-5010 (12MP) and GF8 (16MP) and the FE-5010 (1/2.3") and GF8 (Four Thirds) provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The FE-5010 was manufactured 8 years prior to the GF8 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-5010 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the FE-5010 scores against the GF8 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-5010 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5010 Gallery & Panasonic GF8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Panasonic GF8
FE-5010 | GF8 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF8 over the Olympus FE-5010
GF8 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 86 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5010 and Panasonic GF8
FE-5010 | GF8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-5010 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF8 has dimensions of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 266 grams (0.59 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the FE-5010 versus the GF8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b75df/b75dfd89f298c56542873f922b390bb88a32989d" alt="Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 size comparison Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5010 and GF8 is 96 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca915/ca9151af73933f051018a7d3ef135376bdf1e2ea" alt="Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5010 and GF8.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The FE-5010 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Panasonic GF8 will result in extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged FE-5010 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74061/74061ad6374b7a441181fc52ca9fe7cb4ba40a1c" alt="Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38a6e/38a6e0d722dcfd7dd62e5b8ca1b11378ed133917" alt="Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus FE-5010 vs Panasonic GF8 Specifications
Olympus FE-5010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus FE-5010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2016-02-15 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3448 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/500 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 50p, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 130g (0.29 lbs) | 266g (0.59 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3-shot/10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $130 | $549 |