Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-3
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Updated by Olympus TG-4
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus TG-3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and TG-3 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FE-5020 was revealed 5 years earlier than the TG-3 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the FE-5020 grades against the TG-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus TG-3
| FE-5020 | TG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus FE-5020
| TG-3 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 57 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus TG-3
| FE-5020 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-5020 offers external measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus TG-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the FE-5020 against the TG-3.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and TG-3 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specifications. The picture underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-5020 and TG-3.
To sum up, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should count on the Olympus TG-3 to give more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Alternate name | X-935 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.10 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 137g (0.30 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $160 | $350 |
