Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-4
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also referred to as X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Older Model is Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FE-5020 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the TG-4 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the FE-5020 matches up versus the TG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus TG-4
| FE-5020 | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus FE-5020
| TG-4 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 69 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus TG-4
| FE-5020 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-5020 offers physical dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-4 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the FE-5020 versus the TG-4.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and TG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and TG-4.
Clearly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-4 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The older FE-5020 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Also called | X-935 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.10 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 137g (0.30 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $160 | $379 |