Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ1000
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-935
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Introduced June 2014
- Newer Model is Panasonic FZ2500
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic FZ1000, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 (1") come with totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-5020 was launched 5 years prior to the FZ1000 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief view of how the FE-5020 scores versus the FZ1000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-5020 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The complete galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Panasonic FZ1000
FE-5020 | FZ1000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus FE-5020
FZ1000 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2014 | July 2009 | Fresher by 59 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic FZ1000
FE-5020 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5020 provides exterior dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 has specifications of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") having a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-5020 and Panasonic FZ1000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the FE-5020 compared to the FZ1000.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and FZ1000 is 95 and 55 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and FZ1000.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The FE-5020 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Panasonic FZ1000 will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The older FE-5020 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Also Known as | X-935 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2014-06-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.10 m | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 137 gr (0.30 pounds) | 831 gr (1.83 pounds) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $160 | $800 |