Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also referred to as X-935
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-4, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the FE-5020 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FE-5020 was brought out 5 years prior to the WG-4 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the FE-5020 scores versus the WG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Ricoh WG-4
| FE-5020 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus FE-5020
| WG-4 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 55 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-4
| FE-5020 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-5020 features outer dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-5020 and Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the FE-5020 against the WG-4.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5020 and WG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The picture underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and WG-4.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 to result in more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-5020 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Also called as | X-935 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/500s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.10 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 137 gr (0.30 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $160 | $330 |