Olympus FE-5020 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570: A Detailed Comparison for the Discerning Photographer

In the compact camera realm, decade-old models like the Olympus FE-5020 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570 still have stories to tell. As someone who's tested thousands of cameras across genres and eras, I find it fascinating to peel back the layers on these two contenders that surfaced around the start of the 2010s. Both offer similar price points and feature sets but approach compact photography with different philosophies and tradeoffs. In this comprehensive 2500-word comparison, we'll explore their core technologies, real-world performance across photography disciplines, ergonomic nuances, and overall value. By the time you finish reading, you'll know which baby compact might deserve a spot in your kit or shelf.

Setting the Stage: Physical Size and Ergonomics Matter

First impressions count, and with pocketable cameras, size and handling can dramatically influence user experience. The Olympus FE-5020 is a small sensor compact with dimensions of 93 x 56 x 25 mm and a weight of 137 grams. The Sony DSC-W570 slips in a bit smaller and lighter at 91 x 52 x 19 mm and 116 grams.

Holding both cameras side by side, the Olympus feels chunkier but offers a more substantial grip. Its slightly thicker body and broader front fascia lend enhanced stability when shooting one-handed. In contrast, the Sony’s ultracompact build prioritizes pocketability over grip comfort - it almost melts into your palm. The ergonomics translate directly to handling finesse; for extended shooting sessions or when steadying longer focal lengths, the FE-5020’s heft is more reassuring.

Control layouts on both units reflect their era and market positioning. The Olympus uses a straightforward user interface with fixed screens and minimal manual controls - it’s unapologetically beginner-focused. Sony counters with a similar minimalism but includes some extra autofocus area options and a couple more customizable buttons, which we’ll explore in the User Interface section.

For travel photography where size and weight weigh heavily on gear choices, the Sony’s smaller footprint is the clear winner. But for everyday shooting where grip steadiness matters - say, at a casual portrait session or street shoot - Olympus feels more stable.

Peeking Under the Hood: Sensor Technology and Image Quality

At the sensor level, both cameras sport 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, roughly 28 mm². They share similar focal length multipliers of about 5.8x on their fixed lenses.

Here’s where their differences begin to surface. The Olympus FE-5020 houses a 12-megapixel sensor with a maximum native ISO of 1600, while the Sony W570 steps up the resolution pecking order to 16 megapixels with ISO 3200 maximum.

Both utilize anti-aliasing filters, softening images slightly to minimize moiré but at the expense of some micro-detail sharpness. Neither supports RAW - a significant limitation for advanced photographers who often crave maximum post-processing latitude.

In practice, the FE-5020 produces smooth but softer images at base ISO settings. The Sony W570’s higher resolution reveals finer details but can amplify noise earlier as ISO climbs, especially beyond 800. Interestingly, the Sony’s sensor also enables a widescreen 16:9 aspect ratio option in addition to the standard 4:3, affording more flexibility for landscape and video framing.

When assessing dynamic range - the sensor's ability to retain shadow and highlight detail - both cameras perform in a similarly modest fashion, typical of CCD sensors of this vintage. Neither excels at preserving highlight details in bright skies or shadow textures in dimmer areas, so shooting in well-balanced lighting is advisable.

For photographers prioritizing large prints or cropping latitude, Sony’s resolution advantage is a bonus. Meanwhile, Olympus’s slightly lower resolution but cleaner rendition may appeal to those focused on daily snapshots or web display.

Eye on the Prize: Autofocus System and Performance

Autofocus systems are the linchpin for capturing fleeting moments or achieving precise focus on a subject. Neither camera offers manual focus - a given for budget compacts from this period - so autofocus speed and accuracy become critical.

The Olympus FE-5020 relies on contrast-detection autofocus with a single autofocus zone centered in the frame. The Sony W570 advances this with nine contrast-detection focus points distributed across the frame, providing more room for compositional freedom.

By design, both units do not support continuous autofocus (AF-C) or subject tracking. Live view AF is available, but Olympus's implementation is slower to lock focus, particularly in dim lighting, resulting in occasional hunting. Sony handles AF more responsively in daylight but still struggles swiftly at dusk or indoor scenes.

I've tested burst shooting capabilities on both. None excel here - Olympus lacks a continuous shooting mode altogether, while Sony manages a modest 1 frame per second (fps), insufficient for sports or wildlife action.

In wildlife or sports contexts where fast-moving subjects are the norm, these AF systems barely keep pace. The Sony’s multi-area AF points offer a slight tactical advantage over Olympus’s center spot but don’t approach the performance of modern hybrids or DSLRs.

For street photography or casual snapshots with relatively static subjects, both autofocus systems suffice. Patience and pre-focusing help mitigate their limitations.

Seeing the Picture: LCD Screen and User Interface Experience

Both cameras present fixed 2.7-inch LCDs with similar 230k dot resolutions, typical for their generation but a far cry from today's crisp displays.

However, Sony’s Clear Photo LCD technology improves brightness and color rendition under sunlight, resulting in easier framing outdoors. Olympus's screen struggles more visibly in bright conditions, requiring shading or angling.

Neither unit offers touchscreen functionality or an electronic viewfinder (EVF), which constrains compositional flexibility in bright environments or for users who prefer eye-level shooting.

On the interface side, Olympus opts for simplicity. Menus are straightforward but basic - no exposure compensation, manual exposure modes, or white balance bracketing. Sony injects marginally more customizability, including selectable custom white balance and various flash modes like Slow Sync. However, neither camera targets advanced controls.

Physical buttons and dials on both cameras are unilluminated but intuitively grouped. Olympus features a more traditional button layout, while Sony integrates a multi-selector that doubles as a menu navigator and autofocus area switch, increasing versatility.

For beginners or casual users, Olympus’s interface reduces confusion. Enthusiasts might appreciate Sony's incremental feature additions, even if modest.

Lens and Optical Characteristics: Fixed Versus Flexible in Compacts

Both cameras employ fixed zoom lenses with modest 5x ranges: Olympus’s 24-120mm f/3.3-5.8 equivalent, Sony’s 25-125mm f/2.6-6.3 equivalent.

The Olympus lens starts wider at 24mm, granting slightly more expansive framing for landscapes or interiors. Sony offers a marginally longer telephoto reach at 125mm which can aid in moderate zoom shots or casual wildlife.

Notably, Sony’s lens has a faster wide-open aperture of f/2.6 compared to Olympus’s f/3.3, aiding low-light performance and yielding a shallower depth of field when fully zoomed out.

Neither camera sports optical image stabilization (OIS) except the Sony W570 - yes, the Sony packs optical image stabilization which improves handheld shooting stability. Olympus lacks any form of image stabilization, a surprising omission even at this entry-level.

The Sony’s OIS combined with a faster aperture at the wide end compounds benefits in low-light or indoor contexts, enabling sharper images without cranking ISO unnecessarily.

Olympus’s macro focusing range impressively reaches down to a striking 1 cm - exceptionally close for compact cameras - versus Sony’s respectable but more conventional 5 cm. This makes Olympus uniquely suited for macro enthusiasts on a tight budget.

In summary, Sony’s lens favors overall versatility and hand-shake mitigation, while Olympus leans into ultra-close macro capabilities and wider-angle framing.

Lights, Shade, and Exposure: Flash and ISO Performance

Both cameras include built-in flashes with typical ranges around 4 meters (Olympus slightly longer at 4.1m). Sony’s flash offers more modes - Auto, On, Off, and Slow Sync - which allows creative fill-flash under various conditions. Olympus limits users to standard Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, and Fill-in.

ISO performance is an area where the Sony W570 claims a slight edge. Maximum ISO reaches 3200 with Sony versus 1600 on Olympus. However, image noise at high ISOs in both is noticeable, a standard caveat for CCD sensors of that era and sensor size.

Neither camera supports ISO bracketing or extended ISO boosting. Olympus restricts native ISO range from 64 to 1600, while Sony spans from 80 to 3200.

In real-world shooting, both perform acceptably under well-lit conditions but struggle with grain and contrast loss under artificial or low light. Handshake-induced blur is an issue for Olympus, which lacks image stabilization.

For flash photography, Sony’s additional flash modes create more options, particularly for portraiture or fill-lighting scenarios.

Video Capabilities: Modest Specs in a Compact Package

Video recording is a highly sought feature, even in budget compacts. Both cameras offer video modes, but capabilities are limited.

Olympus FE-5020 captures VGA resolution (640x480) at 30 fps using a Motion JPEG codec, which produces large files and lower compression efficiency.

Sony W570 steps up with HD video at 1280 x 720 pixels at 30 fps in MPEG-4 format, providing better sharpness and smaller file sizes.

Neither camera supports microphone or headphone connections - so audio input/output quality and monitoring are non-existent.

No 4K or advanced video features like focus-peaking or zebra stripes exist - not surprising given their release eras.

If video is a serious consideration, the Sony leads by a clear margin, offering true HD quality and more efficient recording.

Battery, Storage, and Connectivity: Practical Usability Factors

Both cameras rely on proprietary lithium-ion batteries: Olympus uses the LI-42B, Sony the NP-BN1. Battery life data are scarce but hands-on experience suggests modest endurance typical for small compacts - roughly 200-300 shots per charge.

Storage options diverge considerably. Olympus supports xD-Picture Cards and microSD cards, reflecting Olympus’s legacy use of the now-obsolete xD format, which hampers long-term viability and card availability.

Sony embraces more modern and flexible storage - SD/SDHC/SDXC cards plus Memory Stick Duo variants - considerably easier to source today.

Connectivity is another divide. Neither model includes Bluetooth or NFC. Sony W570 supports Eye-Fi card compatibility, enabling wireless image transfer with the appropriate card - a neat but not built-in wireless feature. Olympus offers no wireless capabilities at all.

Sony’s HDMI output allows for straightforward TV or external monitor connections, a feature Olympus lacks.

In practical use, Sony’s more modern storage and output options align better with contemporary workflows.

Diving Into Genre-Specific Performance: From Portraits to Night Skies

Finally, let’s examine how these cameras perform across major photography genres and use cases:

Portrait Photography

Both cameras rely on contrast-detection AF without face or eye detection. Olympus lacks AF area selection; Sony offers nine AF points but no dedicated face/eye detection.

Sony’s faster wide aperture at 25mm (f/2.6) enables mildly better subject isolation and background bokeh than Olympus's slower lens. Olympus’s flash with red-eye reduction helps in casual portraiture.

Overall, neither camera competes with modern face-aware compacts. Sony slightly outperforms in bokeh and AF flexibility.

Landscape Photography

Dynamic range and resolution are crucial here. Sony's 16MP resolution edges Olympus’s 12MP. Both struggle with limited dynamic range due to sensor tech.

Olympus’s wider 24mm lens fosters broad vistas, while Sony’s longer zoom aids reaching distant focal points. Lack of weather sealing on both restricts rugged outdoor use, though Olympus notes environmental sealing - but not waterproofing or dustproofing.

Wildlife Photography

AF speed and burst rate are pivotal. Both cameras falter here: Olympus lacks continuous shooting; Sony’s 1 fps is insufficient for moving animals.

Sony’s longer zoom extends reach. Neither offers reliable tracking - making both poor choices for serious wildlife shooters.

Sports Photography

Similar story: slow AF and low fps prevent meaningful sports action capture.

Street Photography

Sony W570’s smaller size and lighter weight make it more discreet. Moderate macro focusing adds versatility.

Olympus offers macro flexibility at 1cm, allowing detailed close-ups of street scenes.

Sony’s optical image stabilization improves handheld sharpness in tricky light. Both cameras’ slow AF detracts slightly from candid quick-shots.

Macro Photography

Olympus clearly shines here with an ultra-close 1cm focusing distance, exceptional among compacts. This opens creative possibilities for texture and detail shots unavailable on Sony.

Sony’s standard 5cm macro still works well but is more conventional.

Night and Astro Photography

Both lack manual exposure control and long exposure modes ideal for astrophotography.

ISO ranges and noise levels restrict night use. Olympus’s max ISO 1600 and Sony’s 3200 are available but with diminishing returns.

Without bulb modes or RAW, astrophotographers will be frustrated.

Video Use

Sony's HD 720p recording and HDMI output give it the edge over Olympus’s VGA video and no HDMI.

No stabilization in video (beyond Sony’s optical image stabilization, which likely helps), plus no external audio ports.

Travel Photography

Sony’s compactness, versatile zoom, image stabilization, and wireless Eye-Fi support make it more travel-friendly.

Olympus’s macro capabilities and slightly wider lens suit nature detail photography but the lack of stabilization hampers mobility.

Battery life and storage options favor Sony’s more common SD cards.

Professional Use

Neither camera fits professional workflows. No RAW support, poor weather sealing, limited manual controls, and slow AF systems reduce their utility in demanding jobs.

Engineering and Build Quality: Weather Sealing and Durability

Surprisingly, Olympus claims some environmental sealing - yet no waterproof or shockproof rating. Sony lacks environmental sealing entirely.

Build quality on both feels adequate rather than robust - light plastics dominate. For rough use or adverse weather, these cameras must be guarded carefully.

Neither offers physical viewfinders, demanding reliance on LCDs in all conditions.

Price-to-Performance: Which Compact Delivers Better Value?

At $159-ish price points, both cameras offer compelling beginner-friendly features. Sony’s marginally newer release date (2011 vs. 2009), higher resolution, optical stabilization, and better video set it ahead in raw specs.

Olympus appeals with ultra-close macro focusing and a wider zoom start but suffers from lacking stabilization and limited shooting modes.

Examining practical performance across genres:

Sony scores higher across portrait, landscape, street, and video. Olympus’s macro niche earns it points but otherwise trails.

Summarizing Strengths and Weaknesses

Olympus FE-5020:

• Strengths: Macro focusing to 1 cm, wider zoom start (24mm), simple interface, built-in flash with red-eye reduction, environmental sealing
• Weaknesses: No image stabilization, slower AF, no video beyond VGA, dated storage format (xD cards), no wireless features, no RAW support

Sony DSC-W570:

• Strengths: Higher resolution (16MP), optical image stabilization, HD video at 720p, faster lens wide aperture (f/2.6), multi-area AF with 9 points, HDMI out, flexible storage (SD cards), Eye-Fi wireless support
• Weaknesses: Smaller max flash range, limited manual controls, no RAW, no advanced exposure modes, weaker macro (5cm minimum focus), no environmental sealing

Visual Gallery: Real-World Sample Images to Compare

Let’s look at sample images captured under controlled conditions for better context on image quality nuances:

The Sony’s images show slightly higher resolution and better definition of fine detail but with some noise appearing in shadow areas. Olympus images appear smoother but softer, with less noticeable noise but lower micro-contrast.

Control Surfaces and Top Panel Layout

For enthusiasts who value tactile controls, here’s a glance at the top views:

Sony’s extra buttons for AF area selection and exposure bracketing facilitation are subtle but notable conveniences. Olympus’s design is more streamlined but less flexible.

Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which Camera?

If you’re a casual photographer or beginner prioritizing compactness, better video, image stabilization, higher megapixels, and versatility, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570 is arguably the smarter buy. It suits travel, street, family, and hybrid use well.

However, if macro photography intrigues you or you want a smaller budget camera for nature close-ups where overall speed and video quality are less critical, the Olympus FE-5020 is a capable and affordable tool. Environmental sealing may add peace of mind on cautious shoots.

Neither camera is ideal for professional, sports, or wildlife photography, given their dated AF and shooting speeds.

Closing Thoughts: One Step Back, Two Steps Forward

Exploring the Olympus FE-5020 and Sony DSC W570 is like opening a time capsule of early 2010’s compact digital cameras. Both bring strengths from a simpler photographic era but also reveal the limits of their technology.

In practical field testing, Sony’s better zoom lens speed, image stabilization, video capabilities, and storage compatibility provide a contemporary edge. Olympus’s macro prowess and wider-angle lens find a niche few compacts match.

For enthusiasts and professionals considering small compacts under $200 today - these cameras offer an educational baseline. But if serious performance, image quality, or flexibility are your goals, newer models or even a beginner mirrorless model will serve better.

That said, these two make compelling “starter kits” for photography enthusiasts wanting no-frills cameras with straightforward operation - and both bear witness to a fascinating evolution in compact camera design.

Thanks for joining me in this deep dive. Whether you lean towards Olympus’s macro intimacy or Sony’s versatile snapshot package, both deserve their place in photographic history - and possibly your collection.

Happy shooting!

End of Article