Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") have totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-520 was announced 5 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-520 grades versus the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-520 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-520
XZ-2 iHS | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 52 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-520 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 has outer dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-520 and the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/711b2/711b295aa7ef5812069dbf54ca3a82e16c30fa4b" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and XZ-2 iHS is 68 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbadc/cbadce6ccce0f8ef2ba743e0e701b0938a6ec704" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The visual here might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-520 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will deliver extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a437c/a437c57fa0e1d105cac4fea4a35c863f895af6ed" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a89b/3a89bf243f96ec095a2d676cba5325de62416062" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lb) | 346 gr (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | 548 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | 340 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $400 | $450 |