Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 III

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Revealed August 2017
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview

Following is a thorough review of the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-M10 III, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (Four Thirds).

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M1 II was introduced 11 months earlier than the E-M10 III and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores against the E-M10 III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-M10 III

 E-M1 II E-M10 III 
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus E-M1 II

 E-M10 III E-M1 II 
RevealedAugust 2017September 2016More modern by 11 months
Display resolution1040k1037kClearer display (+3k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-M10 III

 E-M1 II E-M10 III 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 III has measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-M10 III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II vs the E-M10 III.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 III size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and E-M10 III is 68 and 80 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and E-M10 III.

As you can see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus E-M1 II to render extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography information
Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography information
76
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
73
has manual focus
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Olympus E-M10 III
78
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
features focus via touch
weather proofing
lighter than others in class (574g)
very good ISO range (25,600)
77
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
comes with focus by touch
good high ISO (25,600)
heavier than competition in class (410 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-M10 III as a Sports photography camera
75
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
high max frames per second (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proofing
supports phase detect autofocus
bad battery (350 per charge)
69
silent mode (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
has no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography information
Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography information
72
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
weather proofing
features focus via touch
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
bad battery (350 CIPA)
67
comes with focus by touch
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
heavier than competition in class (410g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography features
Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography features
76
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather proofing
has double storage slots
bad battery (350 CIPA)
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging advice
Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging advice
79
selfie friendly screen
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection autofocus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with external mic port
lighter than others in class (574g)
32
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic jack
heavier than competition in class (410g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-M10 III
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2016-09-19 2017-08-31
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Minimum native ISO 200 200
RAW support
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 121
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 107 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,037k dot 1,040k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.62x
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000s 1/16000s
Continuous shutter speed 60.0fps 8.6fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 5.80 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250s 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 3840x2160
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 pounds) 410g (0.90 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images 330 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported)
Storage slots 2 Single
Launch pricing $1,700 $650