Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ200/Panasonic-FZ200-front.jpg)
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ35/Panasonic-FZ35-front.jpg)
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Released July 2012
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Renewed by Panasonic FZ300
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ38
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Panasonic FZ200 versus Panasonic FZ35, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both are sold by Panasonic. The image resolution of the FZ200 (12MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is very comparable and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The FZ200 was launched 2 years after the FZ35 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the FZ200 scores versus the FZ35 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic FZ200 Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Panasonic FZ35
FZ200 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2012 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 25 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Panasonic FZ200
FZ35 | FZ200 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic FZ200 and Panasonic FZ35
FZ200 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FZ200 features external measurements of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") and a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ35 has dimensions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic FZ200 versus Panasonic FZ35 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the FZ200 versus the FZ35.
![Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ200-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ35-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FZ200 and FZ35 is 65 and 72 respectively.
![Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ200-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ35-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The pic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the FZ200 and FZ35.
As you have seen, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution so you should expect comparable quality of files though you might want to consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more recent FZ200 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ200-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ35-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
![Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ200-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ35-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic FZ200 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-07-18 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine VII FHD | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,312 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.50 m | 8.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 588g (1.30 lbs) | 397g (0.88 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 37 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 19.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 114 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 540 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $499 | $999 |